2018
DOI: 10.1215/00127094-2017-0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current fluctuations of the stationary ASEP and six-vertex model

Abstract: Our results in this paper are two-fold. First, we consider current fluctuations of the stationary asymmetric simple exclusion process (ASEP), run for some long time T , and show that they are of order T 1/3 along a characteristic line. Upon scaling by T 1/3 , we establish that these fluctuations converge to the long-time height fluctuations of the stationary KPZ equation, that is, to the Baik-Rains distribution. This result has long been predicted under the context of KPZ universality and in particular extends… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(312 reference statements)
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a very similar model (TASEP), the spatial correlations were investigated in [ 59 ]. Outside the class of free fermionic models, besides [ 30 , 31 ] that we have already discussed, let us also mention [ 60 ] which proved the one point convergence of ASEP height function towards the Baik–Rains distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a very similar model (TASEP), the spatial correlations were investigated in [ 59 ]. Outside the class of free fermionic models, besides [ 30 , 31 ] that we have already discussed, let us also mention [ 60 ] which proved the one point convergence of ASEP height function towards the Baik–Rains distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them can be realized as more or less direct degenerations of the higher-spin stochastic six-vertex model. This includes particle systems such as exclusion processes (q-TASEP [22,10,33,43] and other models [12,6,36,54]), directed polymers ( [17,21,18,32,40,42]), and the stochastic six-vertex model [3,1,11,19,24].…”
Section: Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, except for its fourth part concerning frozen phases (whose analysis follows directly from definitions), no aspect of the above phase diagram for ferroelectric six‐vertex pure states had been mathematically proven until recently. To our knowledge, the only result in this direction concerns its second (KPZ) regime and appeared in [1, Appendix A.2], where a pure state μ(s)=μs,t$\mu (s) = \mu _{s, t}$ of any slope false(s,tfalse)frakturH$(s, t) \in \partial \mathfrak {H}$ was introduced for the ferroelectric six‐vertex model. Additionally, [1] established both qualitative and quantitative properties for μfalse(sfalse)$\mu (s)$, which are considerably different from those for pure states of tiling models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the only result in this direction concerns its second (KPZ) regime and appeared in [1, Appendix A.2], where a pure state μ(s)=μs,t$\mu (s) = \mu _{s, t}$ of any slope false(s,tfalse)frakturH$(s, t) \in \partial \mathfrak {H}$ was introduced for the ferroelectric six‐vertex model. Additionally, [1] established both qualitative and quantitative properties for μfalse(sfalse)$\mu (s)$, which are considerably different from those for pure states of tiling models. For instance, it was shown by Kenyon the latter are conformally invariant [23] with Gaussian free field fluctuations [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation