2003
DOI: 10.1049/el:20030702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-fed energy-recovery circuit for plasma display panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the power 978-1-4244-1872-5/08/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE dissipated during sustaining period is lower than the maximum power, it is still the most ofpower driving the PDP compared with that dissipated during resetting and addressing periods. Therefore, the sustaining power module is mainly responsible for overall system efficiency [1][2][3]. In addition, when the PDP is operating on TV signals, the high efficiency is needed significantly at light load conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the power 978-1-4244-1872-5/08/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE dissipated during sustaining period is lower than the maximum power, it is still the most ofpower driving the PDP compared with that dissipated during resetting and addressing periods. Therefore, the sustaining power module is mainly responsible for overall system efficiency [1][2][3]. In addition, when the PDP is operating on TV signals, the high efficiency is needed significantly at light load conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the three-level types of sustaining drivers proposed in [4], [7], [8] are not suitable for high frequency driver by the same reason multi-level types of the drivers have. Since the two-level types of sustaining drivers proposed in [3] and [9]- [14] can change the polarity of PDP at once, there is a possibility open to these drivers for high frequency driving. Secondly, the two-level types of sustaining drivers are classified according to the shape of current waveform in the energy recovery inductor as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sustaining Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10b. Although the continuous conduction current-fed types of two-level drivers proposed in [3], [9] have some desired features of high frequency sustaining driver, these drivers can not be directly applied to whole AC-PDP driver to display a image and have a. Voltage waveforms across PDP the severe problem that energy recovery efficiency of this driver is very low due to conduction loss of freewheeling current in the energy recovery inductor. Also, since the resonant type of two-level driver proposed in [10] can not fully recover the reactive energy of panel even at the absence of the parasitic inductance, this driver is not suitable for high frequency driver.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sustaining Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…noises and increase the surge current ratings of switches. Therefore, the high cost and low performance semiconductor devices should be used in this sustain circuit which not only degrades the overall system efficiency but ' also causes a severe ringing in the panel voltage waveforms [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…problem, and poor energy-recovery efficiency. Especially, this hard switching operation would cause the undesirable voltage oscillation across the PDP, serious wall charge loss, and reduced effective voltage applied to the PDP [5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%