2021
DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.20.06635-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current evidence from the Randomized Controlled Trials Rehabilitation Checklist (RCTRACK) reporting guideline project

Abstract: The final version may contain major or minor changes.Subscription: Information about subscribing to Minerva Medica journals is online at: http://www.minervamedica.it/en/how-to-order-journals.php Reprints and permissions: For information about reprints and permissions send an email to:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…rehabilitation science to accept EBM. Other reasons include challenging methodological research issues in our field [11] and the difficulties associated with the reporting of results [12]. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the practice of rehabilitation benefits from and is in need of an EBM approach.…”
Section: News and Social-media Platforms Should Build Relationships W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…rehabilitation science to accept EBM. Other reasons include challenging methodological research issues in our field [11] and the difficulties associated with the reporting of results [12]. Nevertheless, it has become clear that the practice of rehabilitation benefits from and is in need of an EBM approach.…”
Section: News and Social-media Platforms Should Build Relationships W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…initiatives [12]. Cochrane Rehabilitation and rehabilitation journals are committed to "collaborate [as] groups that have complementary comparative advantages, and help to build a better evidence-support system ... and architecture", "improve the ways in which [we] support the use of best evidence" and to "prepare derivate products communicating what we know in ways that make sense to their target audiences" [5].…”
Section: Reflecting On Uncertainty Misinformation and Disinformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A narrow approach to evidence, based on only RCTs and confusion between the means and the aim, has contributed significantly to the diffidence in rehabilitation science to accept EBM. Other reasons include challenging methodological research issues in our field [11] and the difficulties associated with the reporting of results [12] . Nevertheless, it has become clear that the practice of rehabilitation benefits from and is in need of an EBM approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation as a field and the community of rehabilitation journals are not new to collaborations. Rehabilitation journals have co-published several important papers during the last decade on various topics, including implementation of reporting guidelines [13] and trial repositories [14] , the WHO “Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action” [15] and specific relevant research initiatives [12] . Cochrane Rehabilitation and rehabilitation journals are committed to “collaborate [as] groups that have complementary comparative advantages, and help to build a better evidence-support system … and architecture”, “improve the ways in which [we] support the use of best evidence” and to “prepare derivate products communicating what we know in ways that make sense to their target audiences” [5] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation as a field and the community of rehabilitation journals are not new to collaborations. Rehabilitation journals have co-published several important papers during the last decade on various topics, including implementation of reporting guidelines 13 and trial repositories 14 , the WHO “Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action” 15 and specific relevant research initiatives 12 . Cochrane Rehabilitation and rehabilitation journals are committed to “collaborate [as] groups that have complementary comparative advantages, and help to build a better evidence-support system .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%