2015
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.232629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on the Effective Practice of Patient-Centered Laboratory Medicine

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Systematic evidence of the contribution made by laboratory medicine to patient outcomes and the overall process of healthcare is difficult to find. An understanding of the value of laboratory medicine, how it can be determined, and the various factors that influence it is vital to ensuring that the service is provided and used optimally.CONTENT: This review summarizes existing evidence supporting the impact of laboratory medicine in healthcare and indicates the gaps in our understanding. It also id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring can be well managed by good recording and documentation practice. Automation and computing system for medical record may enhance the quality control in this process ( Figure 1) [2,7].…”
Section: Essential Elements In Patient-centred Laboratory Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monitoring can be well managed by good recording and documentation practice. Automation and computing system for medical record may enhance the quality control in this process ( Figure 1) [2,7].…”
Section: Essential Elements In Patient-centred Laboratory Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This R&D is independent of the testing department aims at designing and developing research studies for clinical application tests for new innovative biotechnology, assisting in technical transfer in clinical biochemistry, conducting certification and auditing for new clinical technologies [7,13], improvement of current clinical laboratory examinations and assistance with internal auditor for quality management. It could be seen that the majority of devices and testing kits from clinical biotechnology companies have passed the quality control analysis while re-examination in the actual clinical laboratory is critical because of the environmental variations [14,15].…”
Section: Adaptation To New Innovative Applications and Future Laboratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hallworth et al . on behalf of the IFCC Task Force on the Impact of Laboratory Medicine on Clinical Management and Outcomes cited the five ways in which the testing process can lead to diagnostic error: an inappropriate test is ordered; an appropriate test is not ordered; an appropriate test result is misinterpreted or misapplied; an appropriate test is ordered, but is delayed or misrouted within the testing process and is not available where it is needed at the time it is needed; the result of an appropriate ordered test is inaccurate. Fryer and Smellie in their ‘toolkit’ for managing demand for laboratory tests suggested 27 recommendations not focused only on the selection of tests but also on the pre–pre‐analytical (shared strategy with clinician) and pre‐analytical (phlebotomy and sample characteristics) issues, postanalytical (interpretative report) and post–postanalytical (audit) issues, with emphasis on the potential of electronic requesting and patient impact.…”
Section: Appropriateness and Total Testing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ese sentido, los profesionales de la medicina de laboratorio, deben contribuir a posicionar al paciente en el centro de la atención sanitaria, y contribuir con los mejores resultados de laboratorio, para su correcta intervención clínica, ya sea para su prevención, diagnóstico, seguimiento, monitorización o tratamiento [4] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified