2018
DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current distribution of 137cs in sod-podzolic soils of different types of forest conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, according to these procedures, soil sampling was made at a depth of 10 cm. Materials of publications [11,12] prove that over time there was migration and redistribution of radionuclides in the deeper soil layers, that is why the above-specified sampling depth does not reflect the current content of radioactive elements in soils. The procedures that were developed for the examination of agricultural lands for radioactive contamination [25,26,33] cannot be used for forest lands.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results Of Improving the Soil Sampling Procedumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, according to these procedures, soil sampling was made at a depth of 10 cm. Materials of publications [11,12] prove that over time there was migration and redistribution of radionuclides in the deeper soil layers, that is why the above-specified sampling depth does not reflect the current content of radioactive elements in soils. The procedures that were developed for the examination of agricultural lands for radioactive contamination [25,26,33] cannot be used for forest lands.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results Of Improving the Soil Sampling Procedumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of sample analysis in a 20-centimeter soil layer have the same values as in a 30-centimeter layer, but it is characterized by a greater variance of statistical parameters. To establish the density of radioactive soil contamination, the 10-centimeter soil layer is not representative, because it does not characterize the current redistribution of radionuclides in soil [10,12]. Thus, for the up-to-date examination of forest areas for radioactive contamination, it is necessary to make sampling 10 times repeated in a 30-centimeter soil layer (at uniform and random sampling technique).…”
Section: Discussion Of Results Of Improving the Soil Sampling Procedumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Лісова підстилка вологого субору утримує -21,09 %, а вологого бору та сугруду відповідно -12,41 %, та 1,70 %, а мінеральні шари ґрунту відповідно до типів лісорослинних умов сконцентровують -78,91 %, 58,59 % та 98,30 %. Як свідчать дослідження [26], через 30 рокiв пiсля аварiї на ЧАЕС виявлено переміщення значної кількості 137 Cs до мінеральної частини ґрунту. З'ясовано, що найбільший вміст 137 Cs відмічається у 12-ти см шарах і у свіжих борах становить -54,0 %, свіжих суборах -40,0 % і вологих суборах -52,8 % від загальної активності радіонукліду у ґрунті.…”
Section: вступunclassified