2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4813087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current distribution in a parallel configuration superconducting strip-line detector

Abstract: Superconducting detectors based on parallel microscopic strip-lines are promising candidates for single molecule detection in time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The device physics of this configuration is complex. In this letter, we employ nano-optical techniques to study the variation of current density, count rate, and pulse amplitude transversely across the parallel strip device. Using the phenomenological London theory, we are able to correlate our results to a non-uniform current distribution between the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulse heights of output signals of Type-II widely distribute, as is expected from the initial bias current distribution determined by the London theory [52][53]. Circuit simulations reveal that the wide distribution of output pulse heights is caused by the redistribution of the bias current among parallel strips after each ion impact, as mentioned before.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Type-i and Type-ii Parallel Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pulse heights of output signals of Type-II widely distribute, as is expected from the initial bias current distribution determined by the London theory [52][53]. Circuit simulations reveal that the wide distribution of output pulse heights is caused by the redistribution of the bias current among parallel strips after each ion impact, as mentioned before.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Type-i and Type-ii Parallel Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…After some detection events, a non-uniform distribution of the bias current is established among the strips in the block with the consequence that some strips are biased at lower and others at higher currents compared to the initial bias current distribution. In recent papers [52][53], both the current recovery after detection events and the current redistribution among parallel strips after output pulse triggering have been investigated in order to gain insight into the factors governing the output pulse amplitude and explain the considerable spread in the pulse amplitude distribution [13], [46]. The effect of the current redistribution among parallel strips after each detection event could also explain why the efficiency of the detectors it does not increase at increasing of the sensitive area as pointed out in [52].…”
Section: The Single-strip-switch Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies [130,131] reveal that nonuniform current distribution in the PND as drawn in Fig. 2(a) is problematic for numberresolving photon detection.…”
Section: Appendix C: Integration Time and Refractory Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection mechanism of an SNSPD depends on the absorption of a photon locally breaking Cooper pairs in the superconductor, leading to the production of a region of normal metal, referred to as a "hot spot". With sufficient bias current, the absorption of a photon by the SNSPD will result in a voltage pulse [22,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. The required wire dimensions for this process depend on the wavelength of the light and the material properties.…”
Section: Integration With Single-photon Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%