2022
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00139-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Developments in Diagnostic Assays for Laboratory Confirmation and Investigation of Botulism

Abstract: Detection of botulinum neurotoxin or isolation of the toxin producing organism is required for the laboratory confirmation of botulism in clinical specimens. In an effort to reduce animal testing required by the gold standard method of botulinum neurotoxin detection, the mouse bioassay, many technologies have been developed to detect and characterize the causative agent of botulism. Recent advancements in these technologies have led to improvements in technical performance of diagnostic assays; however, many e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another drawback of the MBA is the impossibility of discriminating between mosaic types and the partial cross-reactivity of type C or D antitoxin when diagnosing mosaic botulism. A variety of techniques to detect BoNTs have been developed, including ELISAs, enzymatic methods based upon BoNT cleavage of synthetic peptides followed by different detection of the specific product, or cell-based assay [103][104][105][106][107][108]. These techniques, although promising, have, however, not been validated for the diagnosis of equine botulism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another drawback of the MBA is the impossibility of discriminating between mosaic types and the partial cross-reactivity of type C or D antitoxin when diagnosing mosaic botulism. A variety of techniques to detect BoNTs have been developed, including ELISAs, enzymatic methods based upon BoNT cleavage of synthetic peptides followed by different detection of the specific product, or cell-based assay [103][104][105][106][107][108]. These techniques, although promising, have, however, not been validated for the diagnosis of equine botulism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 2010 to 2022, samples from 268 patients with suspected botulism or related neurological disorders (range 11–41 cases/year; mean 19.5) were studied at the National Centre of Microbiology of the Institute of Health Carlos III (Madrid, Spain). Seventy patients had laboratory-confirmed botulism (patients with at least one positive diagnostic test, range 1–13 cases/year; mean 4.4 per year), 34 food-borne and 36 infant botulism, as revealed by positive standard mouse bioassay (SMB, authorized by the corresponding institutional animal care) involving serum, stools, or gastric fluid, and/or by multiplex PCR of bont genes in stool cultures ( 14 17 ). Forty-eight patients were SMB-positive, while PCR confirmed botulism in 22 patients (31.43%) with SMB-negative results (19 food-borne and 3 infant cases).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard for the diagnosis of botulism is the mouse bioassay ( 21 ). Alternative methods such as Endopep-MS ( 22 ) have been developed, but are not currently used in France for the diagnosis of human botulism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%