2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current development in integrative therapy of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer treatment: A mini-review

Abstract: Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide, and there has been a sustained rise in its incidence in both developing and developed countries. Although there are currently numerous effective therapeutic options for cancer, they sometimes exhibit resistance and obvious side effects. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) currently plays a major role in cancer therapy by downregulating the growth of cancer cells through various pathways and by relieving side effects. Studies in cultured human malignant cell lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five trials (6, 8, 9, 15, 16) evaluated the tumor by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) between two groups. Meta-analysis showed that the pathological change of tumor was significantly more stable in the CHM-WM group when compared with WM group (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01–1.67, P = 0.04, Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five trials (6, 8, 9, 15, 16) evaluated the tumor by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) between two groups. Meta-analysis showed that the pathological change of tumor was significantly more stable in the CHM-WM group when compared with WM group (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01–1.67, P = 0.04, Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral neuropathy (such as loss of sensation, muscle weakness and atrophy, loss of tendon reflexes, and vasomotor symptoms) was recorded in 3 trials (9, 15, 16). Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in peripheral neuropathy between two groups (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.81–1.50, P = 0.52, Figure 3E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%