2010
DOI: 10.1086/657583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Definitions of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Is the Emperor Wearing Clothes?

Abstract: Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. The University of Chicago P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may lead to false exclusion of real infections, for example, due to viridans streptococci in patients with severe chemotherapy-induced mucositis [17,39]. In the Oncoped 2006 module, a consensus between the infection preventionist and the attending paediatric oncology consultant is required on the question of whether a single positive blood culture represents a contamination or an infection and to which category (CVAD-associated or CVAD-related) the infection should be assigned [45]. Some experts have recently suggested to invent a new category for those BSIs in which pathogens (as E. coli or viridians streptococci) translocate from the inflamed mucous membranes of the oral cavity or the lower gastrointestinal tract in patients with severe mucositis [24,26,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may lead to false exclusion of real infections, for example, due to viridans streptococci in patients with severe chemotherapy-induced mucositis [17,39]. In the Oncoped 2006 module, a consensus between the infection preventionist and the attending paediatric oncology consultant is required on the question of whether a single positive blood culture represents a contamination or an infection and to which category (CVAD-associated or CVAD-related) the infection should be assigned [45]. Some experts have recently suggested to invent a new category for those BSIs in which pathogens (as E. coli or viridians streptococci) translocate from the inflamed mucous membranes of the oral cavity or the lower gastrointestinal tract in patients with severe mucositis [24,26,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility for the observed change is less frequent reporting of CLABSIs associated with certain pathogens because of suboptimal implementation of case-finding and reporting methodology. 11 Participation in NHSN during the time period covered in this report was a combination of voluntary and mandatory reporting; participation in NHSN related to the CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program was not in effect until 2011 for CLABSIs among critical care patients and 2012 for CAUTIs or SSIs among patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomies or colon surgery. As reporting becomes more comprehensive across the United States, tracking the degree of spread of these and other emerging resistant pathogens will improve and will allow more accurate assessments of how widespread any one resistant phenotype is and how successful facilities and states have been in curtailing or reversing the spread of specific phenotypes across hospitals in the United States.…”
Section: Percent Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the surveillance definition of CLABSI, including all bloodstream infections without a known primary source occurring in patients with central lines, lacks specificity, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia who are predisposed to translocation of intestinal organisms. 24 This study was conducted before the CDC developed a modification of the surveillance CLABSI definition to account for patients with mucosal barrier injury and neutropenia. 27 We compensated for the lack of specificity of the contemporary surveillance CLABSI definition in patients with neutropenia by excluding those patients from the numerator in a sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%