1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70194-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current concepts of coronary flow reserve for clinical decision making during cardiac catheterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14][15]18 In the present study, the CFVR of all coronary arteries improved during follow-up without a change in hemodynamic conditions such as LV rate -pressure product or LVEDP. Although there was no significant difference in APV at rest between the acute phase and 3 weeks later, increased APV at rest might cause decreased CFVR in the acute phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[11][12][13][14][15]18 In the present study, the CFVR of all coronary arteries improved during follow-up without a change in hemodynamic conditions such as LV rate -pressure product or LVEDP. Although there was no significant difference in APV at rest between the acute phase and 3 weeks later, increased APV at rest might cause decreased CFVR in the acute phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Neither LVH nor increased wall stresses was evident, although the CFR was significantly decreased. Because CFR is decreased in patients with MVA, [13][14][15][16] as well as in those with AS, 6-9 the cause in the present patient could have been either. Resting coronary flow to the hypertrophied myocardium in patients with AS is already significantly increased and cannot increase during tachycardia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…13 Microvascular dysfunction is characterized by an inadequate vasodilator response, such as impaired CFR [13][14][15][16] or the production of myocardial lactate, 12,13,17 in response to dynamic exercise 18 or metabolic and pharmacological stimuli. 13 We describe a patient with moderate AS associated with AP who showed neither LVH nor high wall stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the reported "normal" CFR value varied considerably. 20 Therefore, even quantitative CFR significant but modest, and there was no significant correlation between FFR and CFR.…”
Section: Mbf Cfr and Cfr Ratiomentioning
confidence: 93%