1996
DOI: 10.1116/1.588869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current characteristics in near field emission scanning tunneling microscopes

Abstract: The operation of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) in the near field emission regime provides a direct, noninvasive approach for investigating surfaces at nanometer scale. Here, we present a study of the current characteristics in a near field emission STM. The influence of tip’s geometry is analyzed. We show that the electron field emission from the sample is stable against tip-shape changes due to adsorbate diffusion or atomic rearrangements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first (regime 1), occurring at low voltages (<1 V), takes the form of a dependence characteristic of a tunneling junction between the tip and substrate; i.e., there is an exponential relationship between the barrier distance and the potential. The second regime showed a linear-type response in the gap indicative of a ballistic, field-emissive ejection of electrons from the tip …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first (regime 1), occurring at low voltages (<1 V), takes the form of a dependence characteristic of a tunneling junction between the tip and substrate; i.e., there is an exponential relationship between the barrier distance and the potential. The second regime showed a linear-type response in the gap indicative of a ballistic, field-emissive ejection of electrons from the tip …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second regime showed a linear-type response in the gap indicative of a ballistic, field-emissive ejection of electrons from the tip. 28 Finally, a more complicated relationship existed between the substrate potential and tip height at high potentials (>4 V, regime 3), perhaps because of an increased contribution to the current from the breakdown products of air and other material in the gap between tip and substrate. Voltages higher than 15 V were inaccessible using the amplifiers and feedback controls in our system.…”
Section: Low-energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,18,25,26 Lyding assumes a power law dependence 8 and Adams an exponential one, 18,26 with qualitative but no quantitative interpretation. To get an analytical model for quantitative interpretation, we assume as a starting point a Gaussian electron profile n(x,y) where x is the lateral abscissa perpendicular to the y direction taken as the axe of displacement of the tip: n͑x,y ͒ϭn 0 exp͓Ϫ␣ 2 ͑ x 2 ϩy 2 ͔͒, ͑1͒…”
Section: B Variation Of L With the Dosementioning
confidence: 99%