2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac479e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Challenges in Cepheid Distance Calibrations Using Gaia Early Data Release 3

Abstract: Using parallaxes from Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3), we determine multi-wavelength BVI c , JHK s , and [3.6] and [4.5] micron absolute magnitudes for 37 nearby Milky Way Cepheids, covering the period range between 5 and 60 days. We apply these period–luminosity relations to Cepheids in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds and find that the derived distances are significantly discrepant with t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our results are largely consistent with recent measurements, we track differences in two studies, (Wielgórski et al 2017;Owens et al 2022) that employ the SMC to a depth effect. Correcting for the geometry and limiting the radius to the SMC core is shown to narrow the distance range resulting in a sample insured to be at the same distance as the DEBs that also produces a metallicity term on the same trend line as seen between the MW and LMC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While our results are largely consistent with recent measurements, we track differences in two studies, (Wielgórski et al 2017;Owens et al 2022) that employ the SMC to a depth effect. Correcting for the geometry and limiting the radius to the SMC core is shown to narrow the distance range resulting in a sample insured to be at the same distance as the DEBs that also produces a metallicity term on the same trend line as seen between the MW and LMC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…LMC and SMC samples only). Owens et al (2022) (hereafter OW22) compared Cepheids and geometric distances in the MW, LMC, and SMC and claim poor agreement, attributing this to an error in Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and proposing a large, positive Gaia parallax offset coupled with no Cepheid metallicity term (including for the commonly found one in W V I ), with the consequence of a shorter Cepheid dis-tance scale and higher Hubble constant 2 . There are numerous, important differences in the data used by OW22 and ours.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Empirical Estimates Of γmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we adopted the standard reddening law from Fitzpatrick (1999) for our G, BP, RP, V, I, J, H, and K S magnitudes and the reddening law from Indebetouw et al (2005) for Spitzer filters with a uniform R V value of 3.1 ± 0.1. We note that the uncertainty on this parameter is usually neglected in most studies, even when combining Cepheid samples in different galaxies (e.g., Wielgórski et al 2017;Gieren et al 2018;Owens et al 2022). While it is a reasonable assumption for the MW and LMC, the SMC is likely to have a lower R V value (Gordon et al 2003); however, this value has not been measured for our population of Cepheids, so it is still unclear whether it applies to the present sample.…”
Section: Reddening Lawmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Possible systematic GAIA Cepheid parallax uncertainties were investigated using globular clusters in Vasiliev & Baumgardt (2021) and Maíz Apellániz et al (2021). Based on MW Cepheid parallax uncertainties and metallicity effects, in Owens et al (2022) and references therein, it was also concluded that the uncertainty in the derived Cepheid distance scale may be underestimated, suggesting a systematic error floor of ∼3%.…”
Section: Milky Way Parallax Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%