2019
DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.18.880146
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current challenges for epitope-agnostic TCR interaction prediction and a new perspective derived from image classification

Abstract: T cell epitope prediction | T cell receptor | epitope specificity | immunoinformatics | convolutional neural network | deep learningCorrespondence: pieter.moris@uantwerpen.be

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of TCRs specific for the ELAGIGILTV and ASNENMETM peptides showed an intermediate pattern. Overall, the classification of TCRs for different epitopes show very significant differences in performance (Figure 7B), as has been observed previously for other models (Moris et al, 2020). This also suggests that the overall performance as showed in Table 2 is somewhat misleading, as it will be skewed by the more abundant epitopes.…”
Section: Classifier Performance Varies Between Epitopessupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification of TCRs specific for the ELAGIGILTV and ASNENMETM peptides showed an intermediate pattern. Overall, the classification of TCRs for different epitopes show very significant differences in performance (Figure 7B), as has been observed previously for other models (Moris et al, 2020). This also suggests that the overall performance as showed in Table 2 is somewhat misleading, as it will be skewed by the more abundant epitopes.…”
Section: Classifier Performance Varies Between Epitopessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To evaluate the performance of the presented classifier compared to published classifiers in the field, we compared performance with ERGO (Springer et al, 2020) and ImRex (Moris et al, 2020) on the same validation sets. ERGO is available as a web tool (https://tcr.cs.biu.ac.il/), and the models trained on the VDJdb (Bagaev et al, 2020) were used for the benchmarking.…”
Section: Benchmarking Against Other Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These learned motifs can then be used as part of a complex deep learning model to either describe the data in a new latent space or be used for a classification task. Furthermore, since the initial conception and presentation of this work, multiple groups have begun to recognize the value of deep learning and broader machine learning techniques in this endeavor to learn these sequence concepts of immune receptors [26][27][28][29][30] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bornholdt et al [23] cloned an extensive panel of mAbs targeting GP from peripheral B cells of a convalescent donor who survived the 2014 EBOV outbreak in Zaire [9,13]. The authors deposited the sequences of heavy-and light-chains of 349 mAbs in GenBank (accession numbers listed in S7 Table of their publication).…”
Section: Set Of Anti-ebov Absmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, machine learning (ML) approaches have already been used to analyze and classify information derived from cells expressing adaptive immune receptors [9]. Some of these ML applications include predicting peptide presentation by T cells [10][11][12][13], affinity of peptide binding to Major Histocompatibility Complex molecules [14,15], and binding affinity of neutralizing Abs [16]. Additionally, deep learning techniques have also been used in Ab paratope prediction [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%