2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current challenges and future prospects for a highly efficient (>20%) kesterite CZTS solar cell: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
104
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
3
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, conditioning in air results in substantial increase of a number of paramagnetic centers in both pre-kesterite and kesterite. Data analysis that was carried out as previously (Equations (2) and 3, S = 1/2, T 0 = 0.0) shows that the number of paramagnetic centers increases now 37 times for pre-kesterite, 65 times for 500 • C-kesterite, and 60 times for 550 • C-kesterite. In consequence, magnetization at high temperatures (e.g., 300 K) is positive as paramagnetic contribution prevails over the diamagnetism of the sample's lattice.…”
Section: Magnetic Studymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apparently, conditioning in air results in substantial increase of a number of paramagnetic centers in both pre-kesterite and kesterite. Data analysis that was carried out as previously (Equations (2) and 3, S = 1/2, T 0 = 0.0) shows that the number of paramagnetic centers increases now 37 times for pre-kesterite, 65 times for 500 • C-kesterite, and 60 times for 550 • C-kesterite. In consequence, magnetization at high temperatures (e.g., 300 K) is positive as paramagnetic contribution prevails over the diamagnetism of the sample's lattice.…”
Section: Magnetic Studymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The quaternary sulfide Cu (1+) 2 Zn (2+) Sn (4+) S (2−) 4 called in short kesterite or CZTS has been a focus of intense research work for more than a decade now not only because of its great potentials in the next generation photovoltaics [1][2][3][4][5], but also because of its very much elusive chemical and physical characteristics. The latter aspect stems mainly from the compound's capability to exist in stable forms with significant non-stoichiometry (e.g., copper rich or copper poor), with variable/interchangeable atom sites in the crystal lattice (e.g., Cu/Zn ordered or disordered polymorphs, kesterite vs. stannite structures), and relatively easily accommodating various structural defects (e.g., vacancies, nanophase segregation) to name the most outstanding [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the low cost of their mass production, as constituent elements in Kesterites are non-toxic and abundant in the earth's crust compared to CIGS and CdTe. Moreover, they have suitable direct band gap near to 1.45 eV (CZTS), around 1 eV (CZTSe), and 1.0-1.5 eV (CZTSSe, depending on the S/(S + Se) ratio) together with high absorption coefficient (> 1 × 10 4 cm −1 ), which make them ideal among all the second generation thin film solar cells [1][2][3][4]. Furthermore, theoretical conversion efficiencies of Kesterites-based solar cells are around 32% like chalcopyrite according to Shockley-Queisser photon balance calculations [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore researchers are focusing on replacing the rare earth Indium and Gallium in CIGS with Zn and Sn with suitable stoichiometry and improved crystallization such as, Copper Zinc Tin Sulphide (CZTS) and selenide (CZTSe). Because of their crystal structure, these class of materials are known as Kesterite based materials and are inherently good alternative for polycrystalline CIGS and CdTe [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. CZTSe materials have an adjustable bandgap of 0.85-1.5eV and high absorption coefficient in the range 10 4 cm −1 which makes it a dependable semiconductor absorber layer in thin film solar cells [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%