Current challenges and future needs of clinical and endoscopic training in gastroenterology: a European survey

Abstract

Background and study aims A universal European training program in gastroenterology and hepatology is currently not available. The European Board of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (EBGH) has produced guidance regarding expected competencies for European gastroenterology trainees but it is unclear whether these have been incorporated in national curricula. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth assessment of training and research opportunities, professional activities and of socioeconomic aspects of gastroenterology training across Europe through a web-based 90-point questionnaire. Materials and methods Physicians in their last year or who had recently finished their training, from 16 European countries, were invited to answer the questionnaire. Results A total of 144 physicians answered the survey. A minimum number of procedures is required before completing training in nine of 16 countries (56 %). Overall, European trainees dedicate a median of 12 months (IQR 6–25) of their training period to endoscopy and a median of 3 months (IQR 0–6) to ultrasound. Training in interventional endoscopy was not always exhaustive, as about 50 % of participants performed fewer of several interventional procedures than was recommended by EBGH, most participants did not perform endoscopic hemostasis or endoscopic mucosal resection, and nearly a half of participants had no access to pancreatobiliary endoscopy training. Finally, up to 13 % of residents complete their training without the supervision of a mentor. Conclusion In this large European survey, deep gaps and considerable differences in several gastroenterology training activities were found both among and within 16 European countries. Homogenization of educational programs and training opportunities across Europe is therefore necessary.

Robotic, self-propelled, self-steerable, and disposable colonoscopes: Reality or pipe dream? A state of the art review

“…Training in both the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of colonoscopy take considerable time[ 25 , 26 ]. Robotics has the potential to make colonoscopy training easier through more intuitive controls, autonomous features and the increased dexterity offered by many platforms.…”

GI Training in the COVID-19 Era: A Problem of Global Concern

“…Moreover, most of the trainees did not access any other educational resources, such as online courses and e-learning [2], leading to a considerable educational gap. Considerable differences in several GI training activities had already been reported both among and within European countries before the pandemic [6] and changes due to the COVID-19 emergency have further impacted the education of young trainees. It is not yet clear whether this reduction in training will be recovered in Europe, or if it will represent a permanent gap in the curriculum of gastroenterologists.…”

Controversies in ERCP: Indications and preparation

“…Indications, clinical pathways, training, sedation practice, and techniques used for ERCP and EUS may vary in different cultural contexts, countries, and endoscopic centers. [ 1 2 3 ] EUS and ERCP are often practiced by the same operators with a hepatopancreaticobiliary skill set. EUS is an important diagnostic tool to establish the indication for ERCP, complementary to computed tomography (CT) and magnet resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP), and imaging methods have taken over the diagnostic role of ERCP.…”