2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.855656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Challenges and Future Directions in Handling Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale—A Brief Review

Abstract: The role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in stroke was debated for decades. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown fewer recurrent events after PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). However, in clinical practice, treating stroke patients with coexisting PFO raises some questions. This brief review summarizes current knowledge and challenges in handling stroke patients with PFO and identifies issues for future research. The rationale for PFO closure was initially based on the concept of para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are still some disputes and problems to be solved urgently. (I) Definition of the best benefit group: In view of the inconsistent definition of the high-risk population for PFO in the existing RCT studies ( 73 ), at present, the determination of the optimal benefit population is still controversial. The SCAI guidelines still use a risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score >7 as the recommended criterion ( 6 ).…”
Section: Prevention and Treatment Of Pfo-related Neurological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are still some disputes and problems to be solved urgently. (I) Definition of the best benefit group: In view of the inconsistent definition of the high-risk population for PFO in the existing RCT studies ( 73 ), at present, the determination of the optimal benefit population is still controversial. The SCAI guidelines still use a risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score >7 as the recommended criterion ( 6 ).…”
Section: Prevention and Treatment Of Pfo-related Neurological Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no studies regarding IS prevention through PFO closure have included cancer patients and so data are limited. 64 The rates of inferior vena cava filter implantation have also risen in cancer patients, with studies showing that their implantation is safe even in patients with advanced disease, though their benefit in terms of quality of life improvement and survival prolongation is still a matter of discussion; patients in earlier disease stages seem to profit more, being made eligible for more interventions, though careful consideration is advised, alongside the timely removal of the filter (if retrievable). 65 However, their role in stroke prevention has not been elucidated.…”
Section: Secondary Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%