2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1888-4296(10)70022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current applications and efficacy of scleral contact lenses — a retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree well with previous studies about the improvement of VA with ScL on corneal irregularities. [16][17][18][19][20] Visual acuity is the most common method by which eye care professionals assess optical image quality; however, it may be misleading because it does not assess the visual quality related to HOAs. 6,11 The application of WFE provides quite useful information on the ocular optical quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results agree well with previous studies about the improvement of VA with ScL on corneal irregularities. [16][17][18][19][20] Visual acuity is the most common method by which eye care professionals assess optical image quality; however, it may be misleading because it does not assess the visual quality related to HOAs. 6,11 The application of WFE provides quite useful information on the ocular optical quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[12][13][14] Scleral contact lens fitted after LASIK surgery is an adequate option to prescribe, especially when other contact lenses (including piggyback, hybrid, or RGP lenses) do not provide adequate VA or are not well tolerated (excessive movement and/or decentration). 15 A few studies [16][17][18][19][20] have included some cases about fitting ScL on irregular corneas after LASIK surgery. The results of their visual quality were measured in terms of improvement in VA; however, HOAs were not commonly analyzed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 However, most RGP manufacturers are now directing their efforts toward developing advanced designs for use in patients with moderate-to-severe corneal distortions and severe ocular surface disease. 10 Other applications for modern scleral lenses include compensation for high refractive errors, astigmatism among others. 7,11 Short-term comfort, a protective role in severe ocular surface disease, and the possibility to fit severely distorted corneas without compromising corneal integrity are among the main benefits of such lenses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the range of wear time of 7.6 ± 2.5 for the 23.5 mm lens and 7 ± 2.9 for the 21 mm lens is similar to that found for 18 of 85 subjects in one study, 22 it is lower than reported by most other studies. The longer wear time found by two of the studies 23,24 may be due to the fact that they custom-made the lenses for each participant, whereas we used lenses in which only the central curvature, the total diameter and the back vertex power could be modified for the patients. The longer wear time reported by Vreugdenhil et al 25 could be due to the fact that they did not conduct the study with full scleral lenses but rather with semiscleral contact lenses with smaller diameters (17.2 mm).…”
Section: A Prospective Clinical Evaluation Of a New Scleral Contact Lmentioning
confidence: 99%