Current and planned adoption of data sharing policies by editors of Korean scholarly journals

Kim, Soo Young; Yi, Hyun Jung; Huh, Sun

doi:10.6087/kcse.151

Cited by 16 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Whether to adopt a data sharing policy is the choice of the editor or publisher. Some editors are not interested in adopting a data sharing policy because they are worried about a possible decrease in the number of submissions and increased workload [1]. The main issue is that many journals stating that they had data sharing policies did not have actual statements of data availability in their articles.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Background/rationale: Data sharing, which is defined as the "practice of making data used for scholarly research available to other investigators" [1], has been introduced to increasingly many international journals to promote research integrity and reproducibility in scholarly journals. Several studies have been conducted on data sharing policies of journals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Forty-nine editors said that they would not adopt a data sharing policy in the future. However, that report is not an analysis of the literature, but rather presents the results of a survey [1]. No other reports are available on journal data sharing policies at the country level.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science

Jeong¹

2020

Sci Ed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The present study analyzed the current status of the data sharing policies of journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea that were listed in the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and Web of Science Core Collection.Methods: Web of Science journals were selected from the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking. The homepages of all target journals were searched for the presence of statements on data sharing policies, including clinical trial data sharing policies, the level of the policies, and actual statements of data availability in articles.Results: Out of 565 journals from these three countries, 118 (20.9%) had an optional data sharing policy, and one had a mandatory data sharing policy. Harvard Dataverse was the repository of one journal. The number of journals that had adopted a data sharing policy was 11 (6.7%) for Brazil, 64 (27.6%) for France, and 44 (25.9%) for Korea. One journal from Brazil and 20 journals from Korea had adopted clinical trial data sharing policies in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Statements of data sharing were found in articles from two journals.Conclusion: Journals from France and Korea adopted data sharing policies more actively than those from Brazil. However, the actual implementation of these policies through descriptions of data availability in articles remains rare. In many journals that appear to have data sharing policies, those policies may just reflect a standard description by the publisher, especially in France. Actual data sharing was not found to be frequent.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science

Jeong¹

2020

Sci Ed

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Korea, there are still only a few journals that have adopted a data-sharing policy. The results of a 2019 survey of 100 journals showed that 13 had adopted such a policy, with repository sites including Harvard Dataverse (2) and Mendeley Data (1) [21]. There is a Korean journal that mandates data sharing and peer-reviews data [22].…”

Section: Limitation and Suggestion For Further Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal

Huh

2020

Ultrasonography

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the present position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network with a variety of bibliometric indicators. Furthermore, developmental strategies for Ultrasonography to become a top-tier journal are suggested. Methods: The following bibliometric indicators were analyzed: number of citable articles, countries of authors, total cites, impact factor, Hirsch index, authors' countries and source titles of citing articles, and the titles of sources cited by articles in Ultrasonography. Results: The annual number of citable articles was consistently 40 from 2014 to 2019. The number of countries of authors increased to 22 in 2018-2019. The numbers of total cites reached 632 in Web of Science, 595 in Scopus, and 552 in the Crossref metadata in 2019. The estimated 2-year impact factor soared from 2.15 in 2016 to 3.20 in 2019. The Hirsch index was 20 in both Scopus and the Web of Science Core Collection. Authors from 76 countries cited Ultrasonography. The number of source titles of citing articles was 668, and the number of source titles cited by articles in Ultrasonography was 1,246. Conclusion: The above bibliometric results show that Ultrasonography has become a top-tier journal in its field. Ultrasonography furnishes an example of how after changing its language policy to English-only, a local society journal became a highly cited journal in a short period of time. For further development of the journal, adoption of a data-sharing policy is recommended. Furthermore, indexation in MEDLINE should be pursued in the near future.

show abstract

“…Ale w prawie 77 proc. przypadków czasopisma tylko rekomendowały udostępnienie danych badawczych, nie obligując autorów do obowiązku ich udostępnienia (Kim, Yi, & Huh, 2019).…”

Section: Przegląd Badańunclassified

Strategie postępowania z danymi badawczymi w polskich i zagranicznych czasopismach reprezentujących nauki historyczne

Jachimczyk

2019

studia_medioznawcze

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cel/Teza: Czasopisma jako jeden z podstawowych kanałów komunikacji naukowej powinny wspierać badaczy w procesie otwartego udostępniania danych badawczych. Ich upublicznienie wpływa bowiem pozytywnie na jakość badań naukowych, zmniejsza koszty ich prowadzenia, sprzyja nawiązywaniu współpracy naukowej. Znaczenie tego zagadnienia skłania do przeprowadzenia badań nad strategią postępowania z danymi badawczymi podejmowaną przez polskie i zagraniczne czasopisma. W artykule zbadano ten problem na przykładzie grupy 198 polskich i 95 zagranicznych czasopism z obszaru nauk historycznych. Koncepcja/Metody badań: Strategię postępowania z danymi badawczymi zbadano, analizując instrukcje dla autorów opublikowane na witrynach WWW czasopism historycznych, które znalazły się na liście czasopism punktowanych przez MNiSW oraz zagranicznych czasopism posiadających wskaźnik Impact Factor. W instrukcjach szukano odniesień do kwestii postępowania z danymi badawczymi. Wyniki i wnioski: Z analizy wynika, że czasopisma z obszaru nauk historycznych z oporem przyjmują wprowadzanie zasad polityki postępowania z danymi badawczymi. Szczególnie jest to widoczne w przypadku polskich periodyków, choć także wśród zagranicznych czasopism z ustalonym wskaźnikiem Impact Factor wdrażanie odpowiednich praktyk nie jest powszechnym zjawiskiem. Wartość poznawcza: Badanie pokazuje jeden z pomijanych aspektów funkcjonowania czasopism naukowych, zwłaszcza w kontekście dyskusji na temat zapewnienia otwartego dostępu do publikacji naukowych i danych badawczych. Uzasadnia także potrzebę wdrożenia w czasopismach naukowych dobrych praktyk związanych z udostępnianiem danych badawczych.

show abstract

Current and planned adoption of data sharing policies by editors of Korean scholarly journals

Abstract: Purpose: This study analyzed the present status of data sharing polices and attitudes towards such policies through a web-based survey of editors of scholarly journals published in Korea.

Cited by 16 publications

References 7 publications

Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science

Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science

Position of Ultrasonography in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal

Strategie postępowania z danymi badawczymi w polskich i zagranicznych czasopismach reprezentujących nauki historyczne

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About