The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.125421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and noise correlations in a double-dot Cooper-pair beam splitter

Abstract: We consider a double quantum dot coupled to two normal leads and one superconducting lead, modeling the Cooper pair beam splitter studied in two recent experiments. Starting from a microscopic Hamiltonian we derive a general expression for the branching current and the noise crossed correlations in terms of a single-and two-particle Green's function of the dot electrons. We then study numerically how these quantities depend on the energy configuration of the dots and the presence of direct tunneling between th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
78
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
78
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it had been predicted and measured that Cooper pairs, emanating from a superconductor, can split into two normal metallic leads in the so-called cross Andreev reflection process [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . Such process can be conclusively verified by observing positive coincident arrival events, namely, positive cross-correlation of current fluctuations in two separated normal metallic leads that collect the split pairs [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The main difficulty in identifying such process is the overwhelming flux of Cooper pairs that enters the normal leads via direct Andreev reflection (the proximity effect).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, it had been predicted and measured that Cooper pairs, emanating from a superconductor, can split into two normal metallic leads in the so-called cross Andreev reflection process [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . Such process can be conclusively verified by observing positive coincident arrival events, namely, positive cross-correlation of current fluctuations in two separated normal metallic leads that collect the split pairs [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The main difficulty in identifying such process is the overwhelming flux of Cooper pairs that enters the normal leads via direct Andreev reflection (the proximity effect).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1(a). The inserted QDs provide a controllable way to achieve deep insight into the interplay of the elementary transport processes in virtue of the high tunability of QDs [30,31]. In this setup we find that, under appropriate bias voltages and dot levels, the current cross-correlations expected to be positive (negative) in conventional BCS Cooper pair splitters are indeed negative (positive) in our device for weakly overlapped MBSs, but change signs towards strongly overlapped MBSs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The system can be solved exactly in the non-interacting case. The onsite Coulomb-interaction can be approximately dealt with assuming that on-resonance the interaction only leads to a renormalization of the coupling as described above [44].…”
Section: Cooper Pair Splittersmentioning
confidence: 99%