2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01660.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and Future Particulate‐Matter‐Related Mortality Risks in the United States from Aviation Emissions During Landing and Takeoff

Abstract: Demand for air travel is projected to increase in the upcoming years, with a corresponding influence on emissions, air quality, and public health. The trajectory of health impacts would be influenced by not just emissions growth, but also changes in nonaviation ambient concentrations that influence secondary fine particulate matter (PM(2.5) ) formation, population growth and aging, and potential shifts in PM(2.5) concentration-response functions (CRFs). However, studies to date have not systematically evaluat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-ideal combustion conditions within engines may lead to the emission of by-products, including sulfur oxides, additional nitrogen oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate soot (Dakhel et al, 2007;Timko et al, 2010;Yu et al, 2010Yu et al, , 2012Kinsey et al, 2011;Masiol and Harrison, 2014). These substances are emitted within the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) during the Landing TakeOff cycle (LTO) and can have plausibly local and direct effects on human health (Ratliff et al, 2009;Levy et al, 2012;Schlenker and Walker, 2012;Ashok et al, 2013;Yim et al, 2013). Moreover, recent studies pointed out that LTO emissions' impacts on human health are significant in terms of aerosol loading (Barrett et al, 2010(Barrett et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The non-ideal combustion conditions within engines may lead to the emission of by-products, including sulfur oxides, additional nitrogen oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate soot (Dakhel et al, 2007;Timko et al, 2010;Yu et al, 2010Yu et al, , 2012Kinsey et al, 2011;Masiol and Harrison, 2014). These substances are emitted within the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) during the Landing TakeOff cycle (LTO) and can have plausibly local and direct effects on human health (Ratliff et al, 2009;Levy et al, 2012;Schlenker and Walker, 2012;Ashok et al, 2013;Yim et al, 2013). Moreover, recent studies pointed out that LTO emissions' impacts on human health are significant in terms of aerosol loading (Barrett et al, 2010(Barrett et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent studies indicate that aircraft emissions contribute significantly to particle mass and particle number (PN) concentration in the vicinity of airports (Arunachalam et al, 2011;Dodson et al, 2009;Hsu et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2009;Levy et al, 2012;Stettler et al, 2011;Unal et al, 2005;Yu et al, 2004). POA dominates the total aerosol at low engine loads, corresponding to idle and taxiing operation Presto et al, 2011;Timko et al, 2010).…”
Section: Source Emission Measurements Of Poa and Soamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is routinely used to estimate the public health impacts of aircraft LTO PM emissions in the United States (Ratliff et al 2009;CSSI Inc. 2010;Arunachalam et al 2011;Levy et al 2011;Woody et al 2011). While several studies have measured the mass of emitted BC per unit fuel burned, known as EI(BC), the majority of engines in service have not been measured and for these the SN remains the only measure of their PM emissions (Timko et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%