2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current advances in microalgae harvesting and lipid extraction processes for improved biodiesel production: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, PBRs can promote the axenic status of the culture, and are therefore, more appropriate for the production of high value/low volume compounds like bioactive and pharmaceuticals compounds (Chang et al, 2018). In addition, with the harvesting with lipid production accounting for 90% of total energy demand and 20-30% of the total production cost, flocculation has been considered a low operational and energy cost in recent years, with an operation and energy cost of €0.1-0.6/kg and 0.1-0.7 k Wh/kg biomass respectively for closed cultivation (Muhammad et al, 2021;Vasistha et al, 2021). In particular, flocculation facilitated by other organisms (Mofijur et al, 2021), such as fungus (Chen J. et al, 2018) or natural coagulants (Li et al, 2020), can make for cost-effective recovery with costs as low as $0.825 and $0.037, respectively.…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of Microalgae-based Biorefinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, PBRs can promote the axenic status of the culture, and are therefore, more appropriate for the production of high value/low volume compounds like bioactive and pharmaceuticals compounds (Chang et al, 2018). In addition, with the harvesting with lipid production accounting for 90% of total energy demand and 20-30% of the total production cost, flocculation has been considered a low operational and energy cost in recent years, with an operation and energy cost of €0.1-0.6/kg and 0.1-0.7 k Wh/kg biomass respectively for closed cultivation (Muhammad et al, 2021;Vasistha et al, 2021). In particular, flocculation facilitated by other organisms (Mofijur et al, 2021), such as fungus (Chen J. et al, 2018) or natural coagulants (Li et al, 2020), can make for cost-effective recovery with costs as low as $0.825 and $0.037, respectively.…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of Microalgae-based Biorefinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, countries around the world are still dedicated to the development of new feedstock for biodiesel production. Among various new feedstocks, microalgae have become feedstock for thirdgeneration (3G) biodiesel because microalgae have a higher growth rate and utilization efficiency of solar energy than terrestrial oil-producing crops [130]. Microalgal oil production per unit of cultivated area is greater than that of other oil-producing crops [110].…”
Section: Biodieselmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microalgae biomass is separate from the medium, which is a key step for large scale biodiesel production contributing 20-30% of total biodiesel production cost [77][78][79][80]. Due to their microscopic size (1-10 µm diameter), the separation of microalgal biomass from the medium is the most challenging step [81].…”
Section: Harvesting Of Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%