2022
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202202.0303.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Cancer Modeling and Personalized Medicine

Abstract: Tumor cells evolve in a complex and heterogeneous environment composed of different cell types and an extracellular matrix. Current 2D culture methods are very limited in their ability to mimic the cancer cell environment. In recent years, various 3D models of cancer cells have been developed, notably in the form of spheroids/organoids, using scaffold or cancer-on-chip devices. However, these models have the disadvantage of not being able to precisely control the organization of multiple cell types in complex … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 145 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 21 Furthermore, the use of ‘bio‐inks’ permits printing of various structures with filament‐based techniques at resolutions of 100 μm into collagen, Matrigel or decellularised matrix. 22 Plane‐based techniques are best suited to print higher resolution 3D structures, although these approaches are limited by available bio‐inks and large volume requirements making them relatively expensive. In general, bio‐inks allow for inclusion of cells during dispersal which can facilitate even distribution of cells throughout the 3D printed structure, generating an effective coculture system with fibroblasts, endothelial and/or immune cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 Furthermore, the use of ‘bio‐inks’ permits printing of various structures with filament‐based techniques at resolutions of 100 μm into collagen, Matrigel or decellularised matrix. 22 Plane‐based techniques are best suited to print higher resolution 3D structures, although these approaches are limited by available bio‐inks and large volume requirements making them relatively expensive. In general, bio‐inks allow for inclusion of cells during dispersal which can facilitate even distribution of cells throughout the 3D printed structure, generating an effective coculture system with fibroblasts, endothelial and/or immune cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%