2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2285043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Account Deficits in European Emerging Markets

Abstract: Many of the emerging market economies in Europe are presently running current account deficits which are quite high relative to any global or historical standard and are fundamentally unsustainable. This includes the three poorer European Union (EU) members of the old Europe (Greece, Portugal, and Spain), many of the EU's new member states (largely the former transition economies which have joined since 2004), most of those non-EU members in south-east Europe, and a number of the CIS economies in eastern Europ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If such borrowing cost-mitigating measures are decided upon, the optimistic scenarios of higher growth and privatisations could become realistic alternatives to the gloomy predictions of failure, default and collapse that are increasingly used to describe present day Greece. For an interesting discussion of the effects of the credit crunch on emerging markets with large current account deficits see Shelburne (2008). 5 Similar studies for different periods include, amongst others, Alexopoulou et al (2009), Attinasi et al (2009), and Barrios et al (2009).…”
Section: In Place Of Conclusion: Beware the Esm Even When Bearing Giftsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If such borrowing cost-mitigating measures are decided upon, the optimistic scenarios of higher growth and privatisations could become realistic alternatives to the gloomy predictions of failure, default and collapse that are increasingly used to describe present day Greece. For an interesting discussion of the effects of the credit crunch on emerging markets with large current account deficits see Shelburne (2008). 5 Similar studies for different periods include, amongst others, Alexopoulou et al (2009), Attinasi et al (2009), and Barrios et al (2009).…”
Section: In Place Of Conclusion: Beware the Esm Even When Bearing Giftsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A positive output gap tends to increase just before the Great Recession as a sign of unsustainable economic boom (Allegret, Sallenave 2015; Janković 2019). However, the overheating of emerging European economies was mostly financed with foreign capital resulting in an unsustainable current account position in contrast to the self-financing of economic growth in other emerging countries resulting in a stable current account position (Rahman 2008;Shelburne 2008). As a consequence, painful internal devaluation was in most cases unavoidable, as a sign of expenditurereducing adjustment mechanism under crisis-driven external shocks (Kang, Shambaugh 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when market participants pay attention to the growing current account deficits, the side effect of large capital inflows (as a signal of vulnerability and possible overvaluation) can create their own demise. The vulnerability of EEEs to the sudden stop episodes has been revealed, and especially in the period of the Global crisis since 2008 (Rahman, 2008;Shelburne, 2008;Vamvakidis, 2008;Allegret & Sallenave, 2015). Figure 7 shows that (i) in average, foreign direct investments (FDI) and portfolio inflows (PI) in EEEs are far lower from the euro zone level (left panel); (ii) in general, FDI capital inflows in EEEs dominate over the variable portfolio investments in the observed period 2000-2017 (right panel); (iii) the capital surge in the precrisis period is evident as a vulnerability grounds for sudden stop problems in EEEs (right panel); (iv) the abrupt FDI drop and milder drop of portfolio investments happened under the crisis impact in EEEs, as well as the euro zone (right panel).…”
Section: Figure 5 Productivity Rise As a Catching-up Indicator For Ementioning
confidence: 99%