After a decade and a half of experience with the widespread use of flexible exchange rates among the major industrial countries, we have learned a great deal. But disputes about exchange rate policies and calls for international monetary reform are as frequent and heated as ever. The range of views about flexible exchange rates has narrowed somewhat, and the experience clearly has not been as disasterous as feared by many critics who foresaw a repeat of the disasters of the 1930s. Nor have flexible exchange rates been a complete solution to international monetary issues by eliminating the need for international monetary cooperation and by generating international monetary stability as the strongest supporters had hoped.While supporters can plausibly argue that floating rates helped the world economy survive severe strains, few can be happy with the absolute level ofperformance of our international monetary arrangements over the past decade. Thus, continuing interest in evaluating alternative exchange rate policies and regimes and in considering proposals for reform is quite understandable.
Developments in Exchange Rate AnalysisWhile the views that are held by international monetary experts about preferred exchange rate arrangements have narrowed only modestly, our understanding has improved considerably about how to analyze exchange rate issues. I hasten to add that the previous statement is meant in the broad sense of conceptual frameworks in which exchange rate issues can be analyzed most fruitfully. On the other hand, at the level of more specific questions such as how are