2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijfs7030052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Currency Market Efficiency Revisited: Evidence from Korea

Abstract: Keywords: foreign exchange market efficiency; forward rate unbiased hypothesis; covered interest rate parity; central banks; central banks’ policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intrinsically, a shock to the swap rate will result in an unequal response from the spot rate. These findings coincide with those of several other studies (Kang, 2019;Mwangi and Duncan, 2012). It then follows that with the dollar as the reserve currency, there are opportunities for arbitrageurs to make profits off exchange rate disequilibrium, ceteris paribus.…”
Section: Fruh Empirical Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Intrinsically, a shock to the swap rate will result in an unequal response from the spot rate. These findings coincide with those of several other studies (Kang, 2019;Mwangi and Duncan, 2012). It then follows that with the dollar as the reserve currency, there are opportunities for arbitrageurs to make profits off exchange rate disequilibrium, ceteris paribus.…”
Section: Fruh Empirical Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, Uncovered Interest Parity (UIP) might be another theory that provides a possible explanation. While examining the efficiency of the Korean foreign exchange market, Kang (2019) pointed out risk premia in the international financial market and of central bank interventions as the main drivers of foreign exchange market inefficiencies. Levich et al (2019) suggested that after the financial and economic crises from 2008 foreign exchange market became more efficient and inefficiency was related to emerging market currencies.…”
Section: Implications and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%