2016
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cure of Human Ovarian Carcinoma Solid Xenografts by Fractionated α-Radioimmunotherapy with 211At-MX35-F(ab′)2: Influence of Absorbed Tumor Dose and Effect on Long-Term Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, alpha camera imaging [22] at 3 hpi revealed a more uniform distribution of the 211 At-A11 minibody than was previously observed in an ovarian cancer xenograft model for the similarly sized 211 At-MX35-F(ab) 2 [22]. We have previously shown that complete eradication of s.c. macrotumors could be achieved by fractionated α-RIT for mean absorbed tumor doses > 10 Gy [21]. By adding a third fraction to the current study, i.e., increasing the highest tumor dose to 10.8 Gy, complete eradication might have been reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, alpha camera imaging [22] at 3 hpi revealed a more uniform distribution of the 211 At-A11 minibody than was previously observed in an ovarian cancer xenograft model for the similarly sized 211 At-MX35-F(ab) 2 [22]. We have previously shown that complete eradication of s.c. macrotumors could be achieved by fractionated α-RIT for mean absorbed tumor doses > 10 Gy [21]. By adding a third fraction to the current study, i.e., increasing the highest tumor dose to 10.8 Gy, complete eradication might have been reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We have previously estimated the maximum tolerance dose (MTD) for the kidneys following systemic α-RIT with 211 At in mice [29] and reported a MTD of 10 Gy. In similar, we reported that the total absorbed dose needed for the eradication of macrotumors [21] was estimated to be 10 Gy, also. These numbers can be used as an example to compare the therapeutic window with or without NaClO 4 pre-treatment in the current study, i.e., anticipating the kidneys as the dose-limiting organ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead we have, throughout this current work, used a threshold of 10 Gy to describe an eradicative dose. This choice is partly based on our previous work, which showed that cure of subcutaneous tumors from 211 At-MX35 irradiation was achieved at 10 Gy (18). Although this dose carries large uncertainties when used for microtumors and single cells, we have chosen to use it to discuss how intraperitoneal 211 At radioimmunotherapy can be optimized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%