Abstract:RT with contemporary 3D-CRT techniques after TURBT for MIBC in elderly patients is feasible and well-tolerated. Achieving a maximal response and shortening the total radiation treatment time may improve outcomes and quality of life.
“…Preliminary studies have reported a good tolerance in older cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy [43,44]. For instance, there were no difference in survival or grade 3-4 toxicity between older head and neck cancer patients (median age 74, range 70-90) and younger ones treated with concurrent chemoradiation [44].…”
The management of older cancer patients remains difficult because of data paucity. Radiation oncologists need to identify potential issues which could affect treatment of those patients. A workshop was organized in Barcelona among international radiation oncologists with special interest in the management of older cancer patients on April 22, 2018. The following consensus was reached: 1. Older cancer patients often faced unconscious discriminating bias from cancer specialists and institutions because of their chronological age. 2. Advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed patients with multiple co-morbidities precluding surgery or systemic therapy to achieve potential cure in early disease stages. 3. The lack of biomarkers for frailty remains an impediment to future research. 4. Access to healthcare insurance and daily transportation remains an issue in many countries; 5. Hypofractionation, brachytherapy, or stereotactic techniques may be ideally suited for older cancer patients to minimize transportation issues and to improve tolerance to radiotherapy. 6. Patients with locally advanced disease who are mentally and physically fit should receive combined therapy for potential cure. 7. The role of systemic therapy alone or combined with radiotherapy for frail patients needs to be defined in future clinical trials because of targeted agents or immunotherapy may be less toxic compared to conventional chemotherapy.
“…Preliminary studies have reported a good tolerance in older cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy [43,44]. For instance, there were no difference in survival or grade 3-4 toxicity between older head and neck cancer patients (median age 74, range 70-90) and younger ones treated with concurrent chemoradiation [44].…”
The management of older cancer patients remains difficult because of data paucity. Radiation oncologists need to identify potential issues which could affect treatment of those patients. A workshop was organized in Barcelona among international radiation oncologists with special interest in the management of older cancer patients on April 22, 2018. The following consensus was reached: 1. Older cancer patients often faced unconscious discriminating bias from cancer specialists and institutions because of their chronological age. 2. Advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed patients with multiple co-morbidities precluding surgery or systemic therapy to achieve potential cure in early disease stages. 3. The lack of biomarkers for frailty remains an impediment to future research. 4. Access to healthcare insurance and daily transportation remains an issue in many countries; 5. Hypofractionation, brachytherapy, or stereotactic techniques may be ideally suited for older cancer patients to minimize transportation issues and to improve tolerance to radiotherapy. 6. Patients with locally advanced disease who are mentally and physically fit should receive combined therapy for potential cure. 7. The role of systemic therapy alone or combined with radiotherapy for frail patients needs to be defined in future clinical trials because of targeted agents or immunotherapy may be less toxic compared to conventional chemotherapy.
“…Postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy may be provided for patients with BCs that may recur. 3 Invasive BC is a tumor between benign and malignant BCs, which BC cannot be completely resected because of its important adjacent structure, and is prone to recurrence after operation. 4 In recent years, the emergence of small RNA has provided a new way for us to study the pathogenic genes of BC.…”
The current study aimed to evaluate the expression and role of miR‐323a in the progression of bladder cancer (BC), thereby providing a theoretical basis and potential therapy methods for BC patients. Our data showed that miR‐323a levels were significantly reduced in BC tissues compared with those of non‐cancerous tissues. Meanwhile, miR‐323a was significantly decreased in human BC cell lines (T24, J82, TCCSUP, RT‐112) than that in human normal bladder epithelial cell line SV‐HUC‐1. Furthermore, inhibition of miR‐323a markedly enhanced the migration and invasive capacity of T24 and TCCSUP cells. Moreover, overexpression of miR‐323a significantly prompted the apoptosis of BC cells. Dual luciferase reporter assay and western blot analysis confirmed that c‐Met was a target gene of miR‐323a. More importantly, upregulation of c‐Met significantly prompted BC cell proliferation mainly as a result of the enhanced level of phosphorylation of AKT. This effect could be abolished when c‐Met was silenced in BC cells. In summary, reduced miR‐323a expression in BC contributed to enhanced BC cell proliferation and migration mainly by targeting c‐Met.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.