2016
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete columns through cyclic and pseudo-dynamic tests

Abstract: This paper presents the findings of a systematic experimental study conducted to investigate cumulative seismic damage in reinforced concrete columns. Fourteen identical large-scale concrete columns were fabricated and tested to failure. Experimental tests were conducted in two phases. Phase I testing included benchmark tests to characterize the monotonic force-deformation behavior and constant amplitude tests to determine the low-cycle fatigue characteristics of typical flexural columns. Phase II involved tes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monotonic test was able to sustain its lateral load carrying capacity at upward of 15% drift, at which point the actuator reached its stroke limit and the test had to be stopped. Similar discrepancies between monotonic and cyclic tests have been obtained for reinforced concrete columns in previous test programs . However, the decay in lateral stiffness or resistance of specimens CYC and CYC‐NOEQ were similar despite the differences in loading protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monotonic test was able to sustain its lateral load carrying capacity at upward of 15% drift, at which point the actuator reached its stroke limit and the test had to be stopped. Similar discrepancies between monotonic and cyclic tests have been obtained for reinforced concrete columns in previous test programs . However, the decay in lateral stiffness or resistance of specimens CYC and CYC‐NOEQ were similar despite the differences in loading protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar discrepancies between monotonic and cyclic tests have been obtained for reinforced concrete columns in previous test programs. 12,14,34 However, the decay in lateral stiffness or resistance of specimens CYC and CYC-NOEQ were similar despite the differences in loading protocol. This limited effect of the number of loading cycles below 2.2% drift is further investigated in the following analysis by considering the other test specimens.…”
Section: Effects Of Loading Historymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, because high‐strength concrete columns have high compressive strength, they can show brittle fracture behaviors depending on the method of reinforcement that is used. Therefore, verifying that the columns used in construction have sufficient stiffness and deformation capacity is extremely important . In addition, when high‐strength concrete is used for construction of high‐rise buildings, it is difficult to weld the steel reinforcement and steel members because of the narrow column width due to a decrease in the cross‐section of the column, thereby causing construction delay in many cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to engineering knowledge, structural hysteresis behavior is of great value in structural seismic performance. The corresponding restoring force curve is the straightforward means to comprehensively reveal the nonlinear mechanical properties and energy dissipation characteristics of structural components and substructures 6–8 . Some model‐based methods have been employed to simulate and predict the RC members hysteresis behaviors for damage detection and prognosis 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%