2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Radiation Exposure to Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery and Occupational Radiation Exposure to the Surgical Team

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the mean BMI of our sample is comparable to that reported by Canham et al 4 The discrepancy between the average annual radiation dose found in the present study and that of Canham et al 4 may be explained by differences in the distance of the operative surgeon from the x-ray source, as this appears to be a major determinant of radiation exposure dose as noted in the trauma literature cited above. It is also important to note that in the study by Canham et al, 4 automatic measurements of radiation exposure were generated by the fluoroscopy unit and dose calculations were performed by a radiologist. 4 Therefore, variability in the aforementioned factors may explain the discrepancy between our results and those of Canham et al 4 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the mean BMI of our sample is comparable to that reported by Canham et al 4 The discrepancy between the average annual radiation dose found in the present study and that of Canham et al 4 may be explained by differences in the distance of the operative surgeon from the x-ray source, as this appears to be a major determinant of radiation exposure dose as noted in the trauma literature cited above. It is also important to note that in the study by Canham et al, 4 automatic measurements of radiation exposure were generated by the fluoroscopy unit and dose calculations were performed by a radiologist. 4 Therefore, variability in the aforementioned factors may explain the discrepancy between our results and those of Canham et al 4 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It is also important to note that in the study by Canham et al, 4 automatic measurements of radiation exposure were generated by the fluoroscopy unit and dose calculations were performed by a radiologist. 4 Therefore, variability in the aforementioned factors may explain the discrepancy between our results and those of Canham et al 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research would suggest that exposure often falls below current recommended limits, additional efforts could be made to minimize exposure. 9 , 10 In addition, the physical impact of protective garments (lead aprons, etc.) merits consideration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers should keep in mind that the cumulative radiation exposure of hip preservation surgery is a combination of radiation from radiographs, CT scans, and intraoperative fluoroscopy. 10 The utility of imaging studies depends on image quality, user expertise, and the purpose of the study. Readers should keep in mind that the images from the low-dose CT protocol are suitable for surgical planning in the hands of expert surgeons in nonobese patients (body mass index < 35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%