2009
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.1351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risk Estimates in Emergency Department Patients Undergoing Repeat or Multiple CT

Abstract: A small proportion (1.9%) of emergency department patients undergoing CT of the neck, chest, abdomen, or pelvis have high cumulative rates of multiple or repeat imaging. Collectively, this patient subgroup may have a heightened risk of developing cancer from cumulative CT radiation exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
94
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most correctly identified radiography and CT as sources of ionizing radiation. Although children, pregnant women, and women of reproductive age have been identified previously as having an elevated LAR of malignancy due to CT, [21][22][23] one in two respondents were incorrect in quantifying the potential risk of CT to children. These findings are consistent with studies showing poor physician knowledge of LAR due to CT radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most correctly identified radiography and CT as sources of ionizing radiation. Although children, pregnant women, and women of reproductive age have been identified previously as having an elevated LAR of malignancy due to CT, [21][22][23] one in two respondents were incorrect in quantifying the potential risk of CT to children. These findings are consistent with studies showing poor physician knowledge of LAR due to CT radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Griffey y colaboradores (6) estudiaron una población seleccionada de 130 pacientes que consultaron en el departamento de emergencia con al menos tres consultas anuales y con un período de seguimiento de 7,7 años. La mediana de TC fue de 10, media 13, con un máximo de 70.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En la figura 1 se muestra la evolución temporal de la contribución a la dosis efectiva de fuentes artificiales (4) . Numerosos trabajos han demostrado el gran incremento de los estudios radiológicos diagnósticos en paí-ses desarrollados, en particular la TC (63 millones de estudios anuales en Estados Unidos), que representa el 60% de la radiación artificial, debiéndose este hecho a múltiples causas: aumento de la disponibilidad de tomó-grafos, demanda de estudios por los propios pacientes, medicina defensiva, repetición de estudios por falta de información, entre otros (5)(6)(7)(8) (figura 2). A pesar de las crecientes preocupaciones con respecto a la exposición a la radiación médica, todavía hay una conciencia limitada acerca de los riesgos de cáncer inducido (9) .…”
Section: Introducción Y Antecedentesunclassified
“…The increased cancer risk is echoed in other more focused clinical situations such as in the emergency department and evaluation of endovascular aneurysm repair. In these studies, an increased risk is appreciated in younger patients given that they have a longer time to develop cancer from CT imaging 14,15 .…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation Ct and Cancer Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%