2006
DOI: 10.1210/en.2005-0582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Mutagenesis of the Basic Residues in the 201–218 Region of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-Binding Protein-5 Results in Progressive Loss of Both IGF-I Binding and Inhibition of IGF-I Biological Action

Abstract: We have reported previously that mutation of two conserved nonbasic amino acids (G203 and Q209) within the highly basic 201-218 region in the C-terminal domain of IGF-binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5) decreases binding to IGFs. This study reveals that cumulative mutagenesis of the 10 basic residues in this region, to create the C-Term series of mutants, ultimately results in a 15-fold decrease in the affinity for IGF-I and a major loss in heparin binding. We examined the ability of mutants to inhibit IGF-mediated su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5f). Details of the properties of these mutants have been reported previously (22,23). Similar observations were made for the C-term E and C-term F, two additional non-heparin-binding mutants (results not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5f). Details of the properties of these mutants have been reported previously (22,23). Similar observations were made for the C-term E and C-term F, two additional non-heparin-binding mutants (results not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a considerable body of work to delineate the determinants of IGFBPs binding to IGFs and vice versa (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). The structural information presented in this work is broadly in agreement with these data, but disagrees with reports of a critical role of the completely conserved Gly-187(C) and Gln-193(C) (in the IGFBP4 sequence) for binding of C domains to IGFs (2, 6, 29, and references cited therein): These residues are not in contact with IGF1, although they are close to the IGF1͞CBP4 interface surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each IGFBP can be divided into three distinct domains of approximately equal lengths: highly conserved cysteinerich N and C domains and a central linker domain unique to each IGFBP species. Both the N and C domains participate in the binding to IGFs, although the specific roles of each of these domains in IGF binding have not been decisively determined (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). The C-terminal domain may be responsible for preferences of IGFBPs for one species of IGF over the other (2,(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13); the C-terminal domain is also involved in regulation of the IGF-binding affinity through interaction with extracellular matrix components (1,2,14) and is most probably engaged in mediating IGF1-independent actions (1,4,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our studies were almost exclusively done in the absence of exogenous IGF-I, although we cannot rule out endogenous production of IGFs by the cells. However, our studies in MCF-7 cells included the use of a mutant form of IGFBP-5 which could not bind to IGFs (Allan et al , 2006) and this was fully active in inducing adhesion and inhibiting migration (Sureshbabu, Okajima, 2012) suggesting that the actions of IGFBP-5 are indeed IGF-independent.…”
Section: Effects Of Igfbp-5 On Wound Closurementioning
confidence: 99%