2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2019.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative jerk as an outcome measure in nonambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,41,50 Estimates of the median (minimum-maximum) age at LOA ranged from 9.0 (6.0-12.0) years in 32 patients with skip 53-amenable pathogenic variants 36,40,42,49,50,[53][54][55] to 12.0 (7.0-13.0) years in 8 patients with skip 55-amenable variants (Figure S1). 45,49,53 Among the subset treated with corticosteroids, estimates ranged from 8.3 (8.0-8.5) years in two patients with pathogenic variants amenable to stop-codon readthrough 41,43 to 12 years in a patient with a skip 55-amenable variant. 53 Estimates of median age at LOA were presented from three large non-treatment-specific registries, 9,12,13 and one long-term study of ataluren treatment for patients with pathogenic variants amenable to stop-codon readthrough therapy (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Ambulatory Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,41,50 Estimates of the median (minimum-maximum) age at LOA ranged from 9.0 (6.0-12.0) years in 32 patients with skip 53-amenable pathogenic variants 36,40,42,49,50,[53][54][55] to 12.0 (7.0-13.0) years in 8 patients with skip 55-amenable variants (Figure S1). 45,49,53 Among the subset treated with corticosteroids, estimates ranged from 8.3 (8.0-8.5) years in two patients with pathogenic variants amenable to stop-codon readthrough 41,43 to 12 years in a patient with a skip 55-amenable variant. 53 Estimates of median age at LOA were presented from three large non-treatment-specific registries, 9,12,13 and one long-term study of ataluren treatment for patients with pathogenic variants amenable to stop-codon readthrough therapy (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Ambulatory Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that in ambulatory patients with DMD, accelerometry detected physical activity increases after corticosteroid use, sensed the natural history of DMD, and it was strongly correlated with the 6 MWT [10][11][12]. In other studies, accelerometry data was strongly correlated with the Brooke Scale, DMDSAT, and PUL Scale in non-ambulatory patients [9,13]. In patients with DMD of differing ambulation status accelerometry was moderately and strongly correlated with the 6 MWT and QMT, respectively [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jebsen Hand Function and 9-Hole Peg Tests require sustained concentration, which can challenge patients with DMD who have a relatively high prevalence of neuro-psychological comorbidities [8]. Other commonly used methods like the Brooke Scale, the DMD Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), and the Performance of the Upper Limb (PUL) Scale measure upper extremity function at ordinal levels [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical approaches to measuring skeletal muscle function and severity of disease are manual muscle testing, 9 hand‐held dynamometry, 10 timed activities, 11,12 performance‐based assessments, 13 patient‐reported scales, 14‐16 and muscle biopsy and MRI 17,18 . These methods have value in treatment assessment but also have shortcomings, including the need for volitional effort, possible insensitivity to small changes in strength or performance, unsuitability across all mobility levels, and inability to provide insight into the physiology underlying the loss of muscle strength 6,19‐22 . Adding evoked contractions to an assessment protocol of muscle function has the potential to address these shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 These methods have value in treatment assessment but also have shortcomings, including the need for volitional effort, possible insensitivity to small changes in strength or performance, unsuitability across all mobility levels, and inability to provide insight into the physiology underlying the loss of muscle strength. 6,[19][20][21][22] Adding evoked contractions to an assessment protocol of muscle function has the potential to address these shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%