2012
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318265d24e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative incidence and predictors of neurosurgical interventions following nonsevere traumatic brain injury with mildly abnormal head imaging findings

Abstract: Prognostic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skull fractures were observed in this model of closed skull TBl, which parallels findings that skull fractures occur in 30% of mild to moderate patients with TBI (103). The majority of skull fractures were either branched or linear but some depressed skull fractures were observed.…”
Section: Glil-creertsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Skull fractures were observed in this model of closed skull TBl, which parallels findings that skull fractures occur in 30% of mild to moderate patients with TBI (103). The majority of skull fractures were either branched or linear but some depressed skull fractures were observed.…”
Section: Glil-creertsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, linear skull fractures may be considered an interesting component of the impact injury given that skull fractures are found in over 30% of mild-moderate human TBI cases (103).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation could be reduced by excluding mice based on specific parameters, such as depressed skull fractures, which correspond with more severe bleeding. However, linear skull fractures may be considered an interesting component of the impact injury because skull fractures are found in more than 30% of mild-moderate human TBI cases (41). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a change in GCS score is used to identify neurological deterioration, which is often an indication for a neurosurgical intervention, admission GCS score has been repeatedly shown to be a poor determinant of subsequent neurosurgical intervention; our study lends support to this conclusion. 3,27,36 This reoccurring observation should not be unexpected because the GCS was designed to reflect differences in the risk for mortality, not neurosurgical intervention. When we examined the interaction of GCS score and hemorrhage thickness in a multivariable logistic regression model, the odds of neurosurgical intervention for each millimeter increase in hemorrhage thickness was similar for each admission GCS group (p-interaction 0.19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A question repeatedly posed in the TBI literature is whether a neurosurgical consultation, or a requirement for neurosurgical coverage, is necessary for all patients with an mTBI and ICH. 2,3,8,11,14,17,36 Unfortunately, we do not have enough of an understanding of the risk for neurosurgical intervention to create management guidelines addressing particular ICH types in patients with mTBI. 9 In order to better understand the risk, we must collect detailed information about each injury and assess the influence of each variable on the risk of neurosurgical intervention through predictive modeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%