2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative Exposure to Medical Radiation for Children Requiring Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Populations at risk for more exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation procedures and repetitive imaging are children, especially those with complex CHD, and those with genetic syndromes. 314,335,336 Johnson et al 334 demonstrated a wide range of radiation exposure depending on CHD complexity: 0.19 mSv (95% confidence interval, 0.07-29.28) for atrial septal defect repair compared with 28.93 mSv (95% confidence interval, 0.08-76.93) for those who underwent the Norwood operation. The lifetime exposure for an adolescent with CHD is estimated to be ≈20 mSv.…”
Section: Low-dose Ionizing Radiation and Malignancy In Chdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Populations at risk for more exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation procedures and repetitive imaging are children, especially those with complex CHD, and those with genetic syndromes. 314,335,336 Johnson et al 334 demonstrated a wide range of radiation exposure depending on CHD complexity: 0.19 mSv (95% confidence interval, 0.07-29.28) for atrial septal defect repair compared with 28.93 mSv (95% confidence interval, 0.08-76.93) for those who underwent the Norwood operation. The lifetime exposure for an adolescent with CHD is estimated to be ≈20 mSv.…”
Section: Low-dose Ionizing Radiation and Malignancy In Chdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously described cumulative exposure to medical sources of radiation for a large cohort of patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. 2 Comparing lesionby-lesion radiation dose estimates with the present report reveals a number of disparities. This is undoubtedly because of differences in the method of dose measurement, equipment used, operator techniques, practice patterns, and time period.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Two smaller, singlecenter cohort studies of LDIR exposure have described similar rates of imaging and therapeutic procedure use. In the first of these, among patients with CHD undergoing cardiac surgery, Glatz and colleagues 18 demonstrated that although the majority of children with CHD received an overall low cumulative level of LDIR exposure (<3 mSv/y) from medical procedures, a subset of patients, including neonates, patients with genetic syndromes, and patients with some severe CHD lesions, were exposed to >20 mSv/y. Additionally, Johnson and colleagues 19 collected data from 337 children with severe CHD lesions at their hospital over a 5-year follow-up period beginning in 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%