1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02320009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative creep damage for polycarbonate and polysulfone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step down loading creep to failure (yield) for polycarbonate (Zhang et al (1986). Reprinted with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media) Clearly Robinson's life fraction rule is invalid for polycarbonate and the same was true for polysulfone though not shown here.…”
Section: Fig 1123mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Step down loading creep to failure (yield) for polycarbonate (Zhang et al (1986). Reprinted with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media) Clearly Robinson's life fraction rule is invalid for polycarbonate and the same was true for polysulfone though not shown here.…”
Section: Fig 1123mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For a more complete discussion of the various cumulative creep damage rules as well as references to those given in Table 11.1 see Zhang et al (1986) and Dillard (1981). Zhang conducted extensive creep and creep to failure tests of polycarbonate and polysulfone for both single creep loads and multiple step-up or step-down creep loads as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Cumulative Creep Damage Of Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally the relationship obtained between the creep-rupture and constant stress rate (CSR) until failure is very simple. However for some materials LCD law is not applicable as Zhang and Brinson [7] verified for two different polymers using a two step creep loading condition. Yet that simple relationship, between the creep-rupture and CSR until failure, was independently obtained using two different cumulative damage formalisms which do not obey the LCD law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%