2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000175616.00936.1c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative blood oxygenation-level-dependent signal changes support the ‘time accumulator’ hypothesis

Abstract: We studied time-related changes in the blood oxygenation-level-dependent signal during a time reproduction task. Nine healthy study participants retained and reproduced stimuli of varying durations in the multi-second range. During the encoding phase of the task, activity in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inversely correlated with the interval duration, while an adjacent region in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex showed positive correlation with duration in the reproduction phase. Cumulative signal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is already widespread evidence for buildup signals in many brain regions and many experimental paradigms. For example, neural activity related to elapsed time has been reported in prefrontal cortex during duration reproduction (Jech et al, 2005), and in LIP during time interval (Leon and Shadlen, 2003) and motion discrimination (Churchland et al, 2008). During instructed delays with different possible durations, as each of the likely GO signal times approaches there is a buildup of neural activity in LIP during saccade tasks (Janssen and Shadlen, 2005), and in motor cortex during reaching tasks (Renoult et al, 2006), with corresponding changes of corticospinal excitability (van Elswijk et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is already widespread evidence for buildup signals in many brain regions and many experimental paradigms. For example, neural activity related to elapsed time has been reported in prefrontal cortex during duration reproduction (Jech et al, 2005), and in LIP during time interval (Leon and Shadlen, 2003) and motion discrimination (Churchland et al, 2008). During instructed delays with different possible durations, as each of the likely GO signal times approaches there is a buildup of neural activity in LIP during saccade tasks (Janssen and Shadlen, 2005), and in motor cortex during reaching tasks (Renoult et al, 2006), with corresponding changes of corticospinal excitability (van Elswijk et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the issue of laterality of function has yet to be resolved. Several neuroimaging studies utilizing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), or Event-Related Potential (ERP) have suggested a preferential involvement of the right frontal cortex (Brunia et al 2000;Maquet et al 1996;Lewis & Miall, 2006b) while other studies suggest the involvement of the left frontal cortex (Jech et al 2005;Hinton & Meck, 2004;Kawashima et al 2000;Rubia et al 1998;Harrington et al 2004). Still other accounts suggest that both hemispheres are necessary for accurate temporal processing (Monfort, Pouthas & Ragot 2000;Livesey, et al 2007;Coull et al 2000;Macar et al 2002;Schubotz et al 2000;Rao et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 The TRT consists of two phases: encoding and reproduction. During the encoding phase participants must retain the duration of a visual stimulus (red cross), which is followed by a 5-s inter-stimulus interval (gray cross).…”
Section: Time Reproduction Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%