2016
DOI: 10.15208/beh.2016.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture, religion and productivity: Evidence from European regions

Abstract: This study investigates how a region's labour productivity could be influenced by cultural dimensions and religion -factors that have not received much attention in the previous literature. As another novelty, regional-level data (78 regions of 22 European countries) were analysed. Correlation and regression analysis was performed. The results showed individualism to be positively and masculinity and power distance to be negatively related to labour productivity. When cultural dimensions were included, both ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in accordance with the positive effect of individualism on labor productivity found in data from 78 regions is 22 European countries (Kaasa, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This result is in accordance with the positive effect of individualism on labor productivity found in data from 78 regions is 22 European countries (Kaasa, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Authors did not comment on the possible reasons for WCCR differences 32. Kaasa (2016) The author examined the relationship between regional culture, religion, and labor productivity across 78 European regions 33. Rajh et al (2016) The authors examine regional cultural differences in Croatia using Hofstede's cultural dimensions of power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation.…”
Section: What We Know: Theorizing Wccrs In Businessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our research specifically, one relevant aspect of nationality might be how culture changes the way heavy work investors perceive and evaluate their experiences in terms of, for example, being devoted to or obsessed by one's job, working intensely or feeling energetic at work. For instance, factors such as having a Protestant work ethic (Furnham, 1984) might be involved, given that work-related ideologies are seen as responsible for cross-national differences in attitudes towards work and productivity (Czerw & Grabowski, 2015;Hofstede et al, 2010;Kaasa, 2016). Similarly, one might hypothesize that workers from Protestant countries, like the United States, Germany, or the Netherlands (Snir & Harpaz, 2004), are more likely to show higher correlations between workaholism and work engagement components compared with workers from countries with a different cultural background, because we expect these variables to overlap in cultures that strongly and positively emphasize investment in work.…”
Section: Cultural Specificity As a Moderator Of The Correlation Betwementioning
confidence: 99%