Culture-Related and Individual Differences in Regional Brain Volumes: A Cross-Cultural Voxel-Based Morphometry Study

Abstract

Converging behavioral and functional neuroimaging evidence indicates that East Asian and Western individuals have different orientations for processing information that may stem from contrasting cultural values. In this cross-cultural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, we used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) approach to investigate culture-related and individual differences of independent-interdependent orientation in structural brain volume between 57 Taiwanese and 56 Western participants. Each participant’s degree of endorsement of independent and interdependent cultural value was assessed by their self-report on the Singelis Self-Construal Scale (SCS). Behaviorally, Taiwanese rated higher SCS scores than Westerners in interdependent value and Westerners rated higher SCS scores than Taiwanese in independent value. The VBM results demonstrated that Western participants showed greater gray matter (GM) volume in the fronto-parietal network, whereas Taiwanese participants showed greater regional volume in temporal and occipital regions. Our findings provide supportive evidence that socio-cultural experiences of learned independent-interdependent orientations may play a role in regional brain volumes. However, strategic differences in cognition, genetic variation, and/or modulations of other environmental factors should also be considered to interpret such culture-related effects and potential individual differences.

Problematic Smartphone Use and Problematic Social Media Use: The Predictive Role of Self-Construal and the Mediating Effect of Fear Missing Out

“…Moreover, FoMO could be one of the symptoms of individuals with an interdependent self who are struggling with problems of loneliness. These results are consistent with cross-sectional and experimental studies [e.g., ( 62 )]. Compared to individuals with an independent self, those with a higher interdependent self would prefer social media over face-to-face relationships because this allows them to validate their internal attributes, and subsequently might lead to PSMU.…”

Which digit is larger? Brain responses to number and size interactions in a numerical Stroop task

“…Our findings support the hypothesis that multiple factors, such as the specific task requirements, the uncertainty or discriminability of the manipulated dimensions, the proportion of neutral trials (Dadon & Henik, 2017), the proportion of congruent‐to‐incongruent trials (Borgmann et al., 2011), and even language and/or culture (Cohen Kadosh et al, 2008; Dehaene & Cohen, 2007; Huang et al., 2019; Miura & Okamoto, 2003), all affect the interactions between number and size, and hence the pattern of results in the numerical Stroop task. Ultimately, the human brain is actively adapted to resolve conflict information, and the discussions of early interaction or late interaction between number and size (e.g., Schwarz & Heinze, 1998) might be overly simplified.…”

Automated age- and sex-specific volumetric estimation of regional brain atrophy: workflow and feasibility

“…Currently, we limited the age range of generated templates to adults over the age of 18 and under the age of 76 because of increasingly sparser data for higher ages within the sample. It has to be acknowledged that volumetry from the normative sample might not be generalizable to other demographics or populations, as there is evidence for culture-related differences in regional brain volume [ 18 ]. The Rockland sample was shown to be representative regarding ethnicity and socioeconomic status at least for the US population [ 8 ].…”