1990
DOI: 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90140-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites: a less severe variant of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
6
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
23
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An outstanding observation of this study was that none of the microbiological data analyzed predicted SBP resolution and patient survival. Previous investigations have suggested that culture-negative SBP responds better to antibiotic therapy and is associated with lower mortality than is culture-positive SBP (13, 24). This study does not support this contention.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…An outstanding observation of this study was that none of the microbiological data analyzed predicted SBP resolution and patient survival. Previous investigations have suggested that culture-negative SBP responds better to antibiotic therapy and is associated with lower mortality than is culture-positive SBP (13, 24). This study does not support this contention.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Overall, the sensitivity of bacteriological culture was lower in their study (30%) compared to our study (47%) and the average sensitivity reported in the literature (,40%) [1,15,16]. Of note, culture positive SBP has been associated with an increased mortality [17]. Another small case control study [18] reported a preventive effect of rifaximin on SBP in a cohort of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The rate of culture-positive ascitic fluid infection in our study was 21%, less than in the previous reports where it ranged from 23 to 70% [23][24][25][26]. The probable explanation for this low rate of ascitic fluid bacterial growth in our study was the method of culturing ascitic fluid.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%