2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2016.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture growth of testate amoebae under different silicon concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Culturing studies by Jennings (1916) early on demonstrated the wide variation that could be observed within clonal lineages of Difflugia. Factors such as silicon availability (Wanner et al, 2016), food or temperature were shown experimentally to influence aperture shape and test size, both in the field (Wanner and Meisterfeld, 1994) and in vitro (Wanner, 1994). Given the importance of morphology-based taxonomic identification for applications such as paleoecology and biomonitoring (Mitchell et al, 2014), and the comparability of observations and experiments carried out within various research laboratories, taxonomic revisions, or the development of an alternative objective classification scheme is necessary.…”
Section: Testate Amoeba Molecular Variability Vs Trait Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturing studies by Jennings (1916) early on demonstrated the wide variation that could be observed within clonal lineages of Difflugia. Factors such as silicon availability (Wanner et al, 2016), food or temperature were shown experimentally to influence aperture shape and test size, both in the field (Wanner and Meisterfeld, 1994) and in vitro (Wanner, 1994). Given the importance of morphology-based taxonomic identification for applications such as paleoecology and biomonitoring (Mitchell et al, 2014), and the comparability of observations and experiments carried out within various research laboratories, taxonomic revisions, or the development of an alternative objective classification scheme is necessary.…”
Section: Testate Amoeba Molecular Variability Vs Trait Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, two different causal chains can be discussed: either SiO 2 -synthesizing organisms are drivers of the amount of Si(OH) 4 in the soil or -vice versa -the amount of water-soluble Si in the soils is the main driver of SiO 2 -synthesizing organisms as biosilicification is limited by Si(OH) 4 . Laboratory studies revealed that SiO 2 -synthesizing organisms, i.e., testate amoebae, can deplete the amount of Si(OH) 4 in culture media due to biosilicification (Aoki et al, 2007;Wanner et al, 2016). However, Wanner et al (2016) also showed that culture growth of SiO 2 -synthesizing testate amoebae was dependent on Si concentration in the culture media.…”
Section: Drivers Of Short-term Changes In Water-soluble Si At Chickenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory studies revealed that SiO 2 -synthesizing organisms, i.e., testate amoebae, can deplete the amount of Si(OH) 4 in culture media due to biosilicification (Aoki et al, 2007;Wanner et al, 2016). However, Wanner et al (2016) also showed that culture growth of SiO 2 -synthesizing testate amoebae was dependent on Si concentration in the culture media. Furthermore, in situ analyses showed that marine diatom blooms can deplete Si(OH) 4 concentrations in the oceans (Hildebrand, 2008).…”
Section: Drivers Of Short-term Changes In Water-soluble Si At Chickenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation time was observed of being circa seven days. In a recent study, Wanner et al (2016) investigated the growth of testate amoebae (including E. rotunda) under different silicon concentrations (50, 100, 150 mmoL/L). They reported that a population started with a single E. rotunda reached the exponential phase as early as after 15 days (with a silicon concentration of 150 mmoL/L) to the latest after 20 days (with a silicon concentration of 50 mmoL/L).…”
Section: Finding the Best Conditions For Reproducible Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), carbon source (E. coli vs. Saccharomyces cerevisiae), silicon concentration (1,5 mmoL/L vs 50, 100, 150 mmoL/L)), a duration of 15e28 days seems appropriate to obtain a population in exponential phase in both setups (i.e. the present study and the study of Wanner et al, 2016). We therefore choose a duration of 28 days for the ecotoxicological test.…”
Section: Finding the Best Conditions For Reproducible Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%