2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2008.00027.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture, Education, Anthropology

Abstract: This article argues that the anthropology of education must focus on what people do to educate themselves outside the constraints constituting the problematics of schooling. Anthropologists must do this precisely to fulfill their public role as legitimate participants in the conversations about understanding and transforming schooling. When anthropologists work at losing control in their research practice, they discover the breadth of the educative efforts that are triggered by the arbitrariness of cultural fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, religious pedagogical projects are inevitably constrained and shaped by relations of power, patterns of human practice, and the reality that all forms of authority or hegemony must respond to the reality of ongoing cultural transformations (Asad ). Ultimately, this issue illustrates what Hervé Varenne has termed “the radical impossibility of reproduction” (:363).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, religious pedagogical projects are inevitably constrained and shaped by relations of power, patterns of human practice, and the reality that all forms of authority or hegemony must respond to the reality of ongoing cultural transformations (Asad ). Ultimately, this issue illustrates what Hervé Varenne has termed “the radical impossibility of reproduction” (:363).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Researchers of education in Muslim settings should not miss the affinity between Starrett's () perspective on religious training and Hervé Varenne's () broader criticism of the conservatism of theories of education engrained in our disciplinary history. According to Varenne, not only the anthropology of education but our whole anthropological heritage has privileged a view of pedagogy as more or less successful enculturation.…”
Section: Learning As Process: On Morality and Subjectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadening the spectrum to address the anthropology of education, a focus on the experience of an Islamic studies course and the wider debates it engenders allows us to challenge prior theoretical exaggeration about processes of subjectivation. I assert that an emphasis on the “practical articulation” (Hammoudi :51) people have with institutions in concrete situations helps us see learning as inherently processual and thus avoid the conservatism engrained in our disciplinary theorization of education (a conservatism strongly contested by Varenne ). This analytical shift considers paradox, irony, and contingency as integral to theories of learning, be it religious or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The term American references the collective Americas (North, Central, and South), but is often used to reference the United States. Following Varenne's (2008) example, I enclosed the term in quotation marks the first time I used it to indicate it as a “contentious” term, and also to acknowledge there are “words we cannot escape but cannot take as given” (p. 366). Moreover, like Dolby (2004), I consider the term American to be a fluid and globalized social construction, often differentiated from the term United States that references a state formation (e.g., government, geographic territory). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%