2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00766.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture, context and community: ethical considerations for global nursing research

Abstract: High-quality research is essential for the generation of scientific nursing knowledge and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. However, the incorporation of Western bioethical principles in the study design may not be suitable, sufficient or relevant to participants in low-income countries and may indeed be harmful and disrespectful. Before engaging in global health studies, nurses must consider carefully the cultural and social context and values of the proposed setting in order to situate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At the beginning of the millennium, perspectives on nursing education and nursing values in global contexts were topics of concern (Gerrish & Griffith, 2003; Kim, Woith, Otten, & McElmurry, 2006; Swenson, Salmon, Wold, & Sibley, 2005; Wieck, 2003; Wros, Doutrich, & Izumi, 2004). Moving towards the mid‐2010s, global leadership, global competencies and networks have arisen as important questions in the Global Nursing debate (Garner, Metcalfe & Hallyburton, 2009; Harrowing, Mill, Spiers, Kulig, & Kipp, 2010). At the beginning of 2020, the use of nurses’ professional competence in relation to vulnerability in health on a global scale and forming nursing competence in international work has dominated the Global Nursing arena (Brunetto, Farr‐Wharton, & Shacklock, 2012; Gutierrez, Candela, & Carver, 2012; Lesia & Roets, 2013; Squires & Juárez, 2012; Toren, Zelker, & Porat, 2012; Walton‐Roberts, 2012; Zhou, Windsor, Theobald, & Coyer, 2011; Zinsli & Smythe, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At the beginning of the millennium, perspectives on nursing education and nursing values in global contexts were topics of concern (Gerrish & Griffith, 2003; Kim, Woith, Otten, & McElmurry, 2006; Swenson, Salmon, Wold, & Sibley, 2005; Wieck, 2003; Wros, Doutrich, & Izumi, 2004). Moving towards the mid‐2010s, global leadership, global competencies and networks have arisen as important questions in the Global Nursing debate (Garner, Metcalfe & Hallyburton, 2009; Harrowing, Mill, Spiers, Kulig, & Kipp, 2010). At the beginning of 2020, the use of nurses’ professional competence in relation to vulnerability in health on a global scale and forming nursing competence in international work has dominated the Global Nursing arena (Brunetto, Farr‐Wharton, & Shacklock, 2012; Gutierrez, Candela, & Carver, 2012; Lesia & Roets, 2013; Squires & Juárez, 2012; Toren, Zelker, & Porat, 2012; Walton‐Roberts, 2012; Zhou, Windsor, Theobald, & Coyer, 2011; Zinsli & Smythe, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurse professionals’ equal opportunities for professional practice, use of competence and collaboration in academic and practice contexts were described as essential in supportive environments (Garner et al., 2008; Gerrish & Griffith, 2003; Harrowing et al., 2010; Wros et al., 2004). Creating a supportive environment for Global Nursing practice and research was described to require an appropriate ethical framework based on the actual context (Harrowing et al., 2010; Weng et al., 2015; Wros et al., 2004). Hence, it was noted that the tendency towards paternalism that may accompany research based on Western ethical traditions could be moderated in a milieu of collaboration (Harrowing et al., 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations