Culture and the Home-Field Disadvantage

Abstract

The home-field disadvantage refers to the disadvantage inherent in research that takes a particular cultural group as the starting point or standard for research, including cross-cultural research. We argue that home-field status is a serious handicap that often pushes researchers toward deficit thinking, however good the researchers' intentions may be. In this article, we aim to make this home-field bias more explicit and, in doing so, more avoidable. We discuss three often-overlooked disadvantages that result from this home-field status: the problem of marked versus unmarked culture, the problem of homogenous versus heterogeneous culture, and the problem of regression toward the mean. We also recommend four interventions researchers can apply to avoid the home-field disadvantage or, at the least, attenuate its deleterious effects.

Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge

“…Scientific and nonscientific discourses typically consider monolingualism as the norm 44 , and the performance of bilinguals is perceived as a deficit or an enhancement relative to that norm 45 . This is not a mere convention: as discussed below, bilingual children have an advantage in executive functions, but this is never perceived as monolinguals experiencing a deficit in this domain.…”

Should Management Practice Adapt to Cultural Values? The Evidence Against Power Distance Adaptation

“…These results suggest that researchers in organizational behavior may have been too quick to speculate about how cultural values might be reflected in management practices. Medin, Bennis and Chandler (2010) point out that cross-cultural researchers often jump to conclusions about other cultures, rather than studying the phenomena of interest in terms of that culture and listening to their own voices. The results of this study encourage researchers to reexamine both theory and measurement of cultural values to provide insight into a central question for international management: when and how should management practices be adapted to local cultures.…”

Dictionaries and distributions: Combining expert knowledge and large scale textual data content analysis

“…This can have pernicious effects, as measures will be most effective when applied to groups similar to the researchers and their immediate cohort (Henrich et al, 2010). Medin et al (2010) referred to this as "home-field disadvantage." While it's possible to bring in representatives of particular groups of interest, this vastly increases the complexity of dictionary generation and is still limited to groups which the researchers are aware of.…”