The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1108/ijcma-03-2017-0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culturally varied relationality in buyer-supplier negotiations: a multi-session simulation

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the role of relationality in buyer–supplier negotiations and how it varies across cultural settings. Design/methodology/approach Using a multisession simulation design, this study recruited research participants (n = 82) from diverse cultural backgrounds to play the role of either buyer or supplier for two negotiation tasks. Regression analyses were used to test the relationships among relational constructs as well as the moderating role of relation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as data were collected from members within teams, the precise effect of data non-independence on the p values was evaluated (Cheng et al, 2018). A correlational method was adopted to estimate the intraclass correlations (Griffin and Gonzalez, 1995) for both IVs and corresponding DVs, with interaction terms regarded as IVs.…”
Section: Spillover Effects Of Family Incivilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as data were collected from members within teams, the precise effect of data non-independence on the p values was evaluated (Cheng et al, 2018). A correlational method was adopted to estimate the intraclass correlations (Griffin and Gonzalez, 1995) for both IVs and corresponding DVs, with interaction terms regarded as IVs.…”
Section: Spillover Effects Of Family Incivilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is among the first to connect the prior negotiation literature on relationality with a time-dependent dynamic model. With an integrative perspective of dynamic relationality, this paper enriches the extant relational approach to studying negotiations (Cheng et al , 2018; Curhan et al , 2008; Gelfand et al , 2006; Ramirez-Marin and Brett, 2011) and promotes an in-depth understanding of how relationality initiates and evolves in dyadic negotiations over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, the arelational view on negotiation presumes negotiators’ independence and autonomy (Gelfand et al , 2006). There has long been criticism that negotiation studies had overlooked the intrinsic relationality within dyads (Barley, 1991; Cheng et al , 2018; Gelfand et al , 2006; Greenhalgh and Chapman, 1995; Ramirez-Marin and Brett, 2011). The under-researched relationality in mainstream negotiation studies can be in part attributed to institutional concerns.…”
Section: Dynamic Relationality In Negotiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1 Inter-organizational conflicts and their resolution in transition economies A vibrant study field as it is, conflict management theories aim at explaining and analyzing different levels of conflicts, including individual level, group and team level, organizational level and country level (Caputo et al, 2019;Posthuma, 2005). Although majority of the ongoing discussions primarily focus on individual and team-level conflicts (Posthuma et al, 2011;Peng and Tjosvold, 2011), some recent studies have shifted their attention to more macro unit issues, for example, inter-organizational conflict and its resolutions (Ade, 2019;You et al, 2019;Cheng et al, 2018;Wong et al, 2016). Inter-organizational conflict is defined as a process that starts when a party perceives differences and opposition with another party on interests, resources, practices, beliefs and values or whatever matters to both sides (Ma et al, 2017).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%