Culturally Responsive Teaching Knowledge and Practices of Online Faculty

Abstract

Cultural differences between faculty and their students can create important challenges that affect the quality and efficacy of online teaching and learning. The objectives of this study were to: (a) create and pilot test an assessment for online faculty to measure culturally responsive teaching knowledge (CRT) and culturally responsive educational practices (CREP) in teaching and advising students of color, military students, LGBTQ students, religious minority students, and international students; (b) describe participants' CRT knowledge, value, and CREP; and (c) examine differences between their knowledge and their practices. The combined pilot and main study sample was comprised of 47 completed surveys. Internal consistency reliability was high for all subscales (.895-.970); subscale intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from .526-.833. The pilot round revealed strong face and content validity. Campbell-Fiske multitraitmultimethod matrix generated evidence of construct validity. Within-group comparisons of subscale scores using Wilcoxon Signed-ranks test revealed some significant differences between perceived knowledge and practice. Mann Whitney U test did not reveal significant differences in subscale scores or overall score by sector, degree level taught, or gender. The results have important implications for faculty training, professional development, mentoring, and support. Faculty who teach online who understand and value culturally responsive pedagogy and have the knowledge and skills to implement best practices in meeting the needs of diverse learners will enhance both teaching and learning. Culturally responsive knowledges and practice are particularly important as online programs are becoming ubiquitous across traditional institutions of higher education and their core faculty are teaching an increasingly diverse student body.

Factors Potentially Influencing Discipline Referral and Suspensions at an Affiliated Charter High School

“…Many teacher education programs do not prepare sufficiently pre-service teachers to meet the needs of diverse students. The professional literature sets the context for educators that, to meet the needs of diverse students, they must recognize the importance of identity, language, and culture in shaping the way students behave and learn (Heitner & Jennings, 2016). Furthermore, through better understanding student diversity, educators will be able to help diverse students to achieve academic success while respecting their identities and backgrounds as meaningful opportunities to create optimal learning environments.…”

Using an Ethos of Care to Bridge the Digital Divide: Exploring Faculty Narratives During a Global Pandemic

“…In an effort towards a loving critique, Paris (2012) calls for a move towards pedagogy that not only incorporates multicultural elements, is relevant and responsive to student's cultural identity, but also affirms and sustains the heritage of students and their communities. This includes the cultural, linguistic, and community practices of students, practice that is centered on care and awareness of the complexities and challenges that students from different backgrounds face (Heitner & Jennings, 2016;Paris & Alim, 2017;Robinson et. al., 2017).…”

“…Research on culturally sustaining pedagogy in online learning has largely been focused on the K-12 system, demonstrating a clear gap in needed research that focuses on CSP within online learning and higher education (Heitner & Jennings, 2016). More research is needed in this area because online learning spaces create a situation where "time, distance, technology, and connectivity inadequacies affect students" (Robinson et.…”

Who Is Welcome Here? A Culturally Responsive Content Analysis of Makerspace Websites

“…Where teachers used CRP in social studies, Chicano students outscored White students on State reading, writing, and math exams, and Chicano students' graduation rates exceeded those of White students. Recent research highlights a growing interest in teaching practices of CRP in online environments (e.g., Heitner & Jennings, 2016), but the impact of CRP on student outcomes in online environments has not yet been explored.…”