2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10903-017-0548-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culturally Relevant Human Subjects Protection Training: A Case Study in Community-Engaged Research in the United States

Abstract: Background Non-academic members of research teams, such as community members, can perceive traditional human subjects protection training as lacking in cultural relevance. We present a case exemplar of the development of a human subjects protection training for research staff with limited English proficiency and/or no or limited research experience. Methods Seven modules were adapted for language, cultural examples, etc., from the standard Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) human subjects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average time to complete all modules required to receive human subjects research certification is about 2 to 4 hours depending on the organization’s requirements (Hansen & Braunschweiger, 2000), and a refresher course may be required approximately every 3 years or as required byan institution. Most researchers find the CITI training program too complex for those with limited research experience and recommend tailoring human subjects training to meet the needs of nonresearchers or community partners (Anderson, 2015; Hawley, Wieland, Weis, & Sia, 2014; Kue, Szalacha, Happ, Crisp, & Menon, 2017; Merritt et al, 2010; Solomon & Piechowski, 2011; Terpstra, Coleman, Simon, & Nebeker, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average time to complete all modules required to receive human subjects research certification is about 2 to 4 hours depending on the organization’s requirements (Hansen & Braunschweiger, 2000), and a refresher course may be required approximately every 3 years or as required byan institution. Most researchers find the CITI training program too complex for those with limited research experience and recommend tailoring human subjects training to meet the needs of nonresearchers or community partners (Anderson, 2015; Hawley, Wieland, Weis, & Sia, 2014; Kue, Szalacha, Happ, Crisp, & Menon, 2017; Merritt et al, 2010; Solomon & Piechowski, 2011; Terpstra, Coleman, Simon, & Nebeker, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nebeker et al (2015) in their human research ethics training for promotores included culturally relevant scenarios, which they called "situations," to read and discuss. Likewise, Kue et al (2018) in their training with Cambodian and Lao women incorporated scenarios, cultural references, and example situations in the local community. Their trainings, like ours, had space for trainees to ask for clarifications and solve problems.…”
Section: > > Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of the study and their role in contributing to the betterment of their work environment by concerned parties was explained to all food-service workers. Protecting research participants from unethical treatment and infringement of rights is an assigned responsibility of all researchers conducting a study on human subjects (Kue et al 2018). As the study traverses cultures, the researcher acknowledges the sensitivity of matters relating to culturally specific behaviour.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%