Cultural Values in Water Management and Governance: Where Do We Stand?

Abstract

Research in water governance and management is a complex subject that involves the appraisal of social, economic, and environmental–biophysical aspects. Cultural and social values are regarded as key drivers in decision-making processes in both domains. Identifying relevant cultural values however is difficult given the interdisciplinary nature of theoretical frameworks and the implementation and operational needs of water governance/management research. In this work, we conduct a systematic literature review and thematic analysis of existing theories of culture (ToC) to identify common cultural values, theoretical frameworks, disciplinary trajectories and implementation trends relevant to water management and governance. Results indicate that the dominant ToC corresponds to Cultural Theory with its four defined categories (Egalitarian–Hierarchist–Individualist–Fatalist). In addition, results show emergent cultural values linked to “local” place-based knowledge perspectives indicating a more pluriversal understanding of cultural values. Cultural values associated with water management revolve around anthropocentrism, whereas values associated with water governance revolve around concepts of provenance/places. Implementation of ToC/cultural values is limited in practical applications, and we provide an example on how to improve on that. We suggest a succinct theory of culture such as Schwartz’s cultural values be considered to be an alternative to capture a greater heterogeneity across the breadth of water governance/management-related and basin-specific contexts.

Exploring the link between drought‐related terms and public interests: Global insights from LSTM‐based predictions and Google Trends analysis

“…In some cultures, water is considered a sacred and essential resource, and any threat to its availability or quality may evoke a stronger response from the public (Alley, 2011; Sultana & Loftus, 2011; Walters, 2013). Additionally, the cultural norms around environmentalism and sustainable living may differ across regions, influencing the level of public sensitivity towards water quantity issues (Heinrichs & Rojas, 2022; Milcu et al, 2013). Media coverage of the issue can also contribute to the differences in public sensitivity.…”

The role of environmental literacy, psychological distance of climate change, and collectivism on generation Z's collaborative consumption tendency

“…In this vein, this study is deemed an initial effort that validated the role of culture in collaborative consumption for the first time in literature, hence extending the consumer culture theory, which strives to analyze consumer behavior from a cultural point of view as opposed to economic and psychological factors (Arnould & Thompson, 2005). To conclude, the present study makes a theoretical contribution to consumer behavior by focusing on the relationship between culture and sharing economy (Albinsson et al, 2019;De Mooij, 2019;Gupta et al, 2019;Heinrichs & Rojas, 2022).…”

Place of Social, Cultural, and Ecological Water Values for Promoting Water Security in Delhi, India

“…The existing literature on water values shows that urban water management primarily focuses on technical dimensions and economic gains. Socio-cultural and ecological values are largely sidelined [15]. For example, using potable water and groundwater for the maintenance of cricket grounds exhibits economic values, as these grounds can be easily maintained by adequately treated wastewater [16].…”