This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.1993 in which the Madımak hotel in the Turkish city of Sivas was set on fire and 37 Alevi intellectuals died in the flames. We examine how the narrative of the massacre functions as political capital in creating a shared moral identity-an identity based on moral values and innocent victimhood (Hardy & Carlo, 2005). Ethnic and national narratives provide accounts of the group's origin, its nature, and its relationship to others. These narratives are analyzed as the changing result of continuous ''group-making projects'' by activists and organizations (e.g., Brubaker, 2004). Specifically, the social identity perspective developed in social psychology (Turner & Reynolds, 2001) argues that a shared identity forms the psychological basis for mobilization and collective action (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001).We adopt the social identity perspective for examining how the largest Alevi organization in Europe, the Confederation of European Alevi Unions (Avrupa Alevi Birlikleri Konfederasyonu [AABK]), construes and uses the collective trauma of Madımak to define Alevi identity and an inclusive victimhood. Focusing on the group understandings of Alevi activists in Europe is interesting for two reasons. First, it is not so much Alevis in Turkey but, rather, those in Europe that try to establish a common Alevi identity and to increase the public visibility of Alevism (S. S ¸ahin, 2005). The AABK predominantly focuses on the oppression and discrimination of Alevis in Turkey. They are transnational and active, for example, by establishing religious Cem Houses and their satellite TV station, YOL TV. Second, Alevi organizations face a serious challenge when it comes to unification and unity. The diversity among the Alevis is substantial and there is a clear lack of consensus about what it means to be an Alevi (So ¨kefeld, 2008). The internal diversity has led to various movements, which make the establishment of a common Alevi identity and a sense of commitment among the different subgroups a continuous challenge for Alevi leaders and organizations that seek to improve the situation of Alevis in Turkey. Furthermore, even when Alevis succeed in developing a shared identity, they remain, numerically, a minority group that is politically relatively powerless. In Turkey, however, they are not the only minority group that faces oppression. A sense of shared victimhood can form a basis for mobilizing these other groups.
SOCIOPOLITICAL HISTORYAlevism, historically Kızılbas ¸lık (literally, Redhead), refers to a heterodox, syncretic faith with a mix of mystical Sufi Islam, polytheist beliefs of Mesopotamia and Central Asia, and Shi'ite Islam (Moosa, 1988). Most Alevi live in Anatolia, Turkey, but Alevism is spread across Asia Minor
YILDIZ AND VERKUYTENThis document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of...