2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10260-011-0175-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural tourism and temporary art exhibitions in Italy: a panel data analysis

Abstract: Cultural tourism, Error component regression model, Panel data, Temporary art exhibitions,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a recent contribution, in which endogeneity is dealt with by selecting an appropriate estimation strategy, questions this assumption. Applying dynamic panel data analysis to a dataset of 52 Italian provinces between 2003and 2007, Di Lascio et al (2011 analyse whether the number of art exhibition affects contemporary and future tourism flows. They find an effect of exhibitions on tourism, but its size is very small.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent contribution, in which endogeneity is dealt with by selecting an appropriate estimation strategy, questions this assumption. Applying dynamic panel data analysis to a dataset of 52 Italian provinces between 2003and 2007, Di Lascio et al (2011 analyse whether the number of art exhibition affects contemporary and future tourism flows. They find an effect of exhibitions on tourism, but its size is very small.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, different measures, corresponding to different typologies of tangible cultural heritage have been included in the empirical analysis by the literature intensifying the heterogeneity across studies. Among others, Di Lascio, Giannerini, Scorcu, and Candela (2011) include in their panel‐data analysis a variable related to temporary art exhibitions; Cuccia and Cellini (2007) use museums and monuments attendance in their time‐series analysis; Yang et al (2010) add the number of cultural areas as classified according to Chinese regulation to their gravity model; Pompili, Pisati, and Lorenzini (2019) use a proxy for cultural importance together with the number of museums in their spatial Durbin model, and several studies use the UNESCO World Heritage Sites classification (Groizard & Santana‐Gallego, 2018; Huang, Tsaur, & Yang, 2012; Ribaudo & Figini, 2016). Regarding the inclusion of UNESCO World Heritage Sites as a heritage‐related variable a different interpretation of the results is needed: the focus is shifted from the pure endowment of cultural heritage to its internationally recognized outstanding value (subsequent to a spontaneous candidacy) and visibility or on the impact of the labelling procedure.…”
Section: Tangible Cultural Heritage and Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, previous studies have suggested that temporary exhibitions of modern art have a positive impact on tourism [8]. Therefore, if we want to quantitatively analyze the impact of exhibitions on sustainable tourism (i.e., exhibition-driven tourism), then the number of tourists is a clear and direct indicator [9][10][11].…”
Section: The Logical Model and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di Lascio et al [8] studied the relationship between cultural tourism and temporary art exhibitions using a panel data analysis. Panel data are a multi-dimensional type of data involving measurements over time [74].…”
Section: Panel Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation