Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping And Social Consequences of ICTs, Updated Student Edition 2010
DOI: 10.4135/9781446211304.n9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Studies and Communication Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Bimber may be technically accurate in making his point, his argument seems to beg the question arising from the dilemma of technology being considered to have any autonomy of its own. Beyond the question of strict causality, Slack and Wise (2006) emphasized that regardless of actual cause and effect, our attitudes toward technology make a difference. For Braman (2004), philosophical differences regarding technology are largely differences in attitude toward technology, and these differences matter from a policy and decision making standpoint and affect our perception of risks and opportunities.…”
Section: Theoretical Interpretations and Accounts Of Technological Dementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While Bimber may be technically accurate in making his point, his argument seems to beg the question arising from the dilemma of technology being considered to have any autonomy of its own. Beyond the question of strict causality, Slack and Wise (2006) emphasized that regardless of actual cause and effect, our attitudes toward technology make a difference. For Braman (2004), philosophical differences regarding technology are largely differences in attitude toward technology, and these differences matter from a policy and decision making standpoint and affect our perception of risks and opportunities.…”
Section: Theoretical Interpretations and Accounts Of Technological Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If technology operates with any determinative efficacy, driving historical events and society, does this not limit free human agency (Marx andSmith 1994, Kritt andWinegar 2010)? Any claim that we do not control technology, but are controlled by it seems in some way to be a renunciation of human responsibility for technology (Hofmann 2006, Slack and Wise 2006, Wyatt 2008). Granting a control or determined autonomy to technology, apart from purposeful human control and direction, would present a dilemma by limiting human agency and responsibility for technology (Webster 2013, Fisher 2006, Hofmann 2006, Jonas [1974 2009, Jonas, [1979] 2010, Kritt and Winegar 2010, Slack and Wise 2006, Strobel and Tillberg-Webb 2009, Wyatt 2008).…”
Section: Human Agency and Responsibility For Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High hopes have been associated with the concept of Bruno Latour [4], which was based on a completely different type of understanding of the world of phenomena, above all social, which was also applied in management by [5]; however, it has not achieved similar popularity. The idea of complexity (in a way, similar to the idea of Latour) provides a very promising description mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is supported by Jordan (2002), who describes that in non-English speaking countries English is taught in various courses such as English as a Foreign Language (EFL); English as a Second On one hand, some people argue that the global status of English can not be separated from its other popular role as the language of science and technology (Jazadi, 2004). Similarly, Slack and Wise (2006) in Cultural Studies and Communication Technology emphasise that technology and language are strongly connected in the society. On the other hand, new media -particularly internet-may play important role in popularizing English as a global language.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%